Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE SCREAM IS STOLEN
Sky News ^ | 8/22/04

Posted on 08/22/2004 4:22:56 AM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Lady Jag
Good Heavens, what an intricate field picture. I am having some difficulty estimating the scale as there are no other objects of known size in the photo. I'm sure it's huge though. What a complicated pattern to keep track of while cutting it. I cut mine on a rolling hillside. I was only able to see one letter while cutting the next. The guy who did the one you found really had to have done his homework!

Good find.

AV


61 posted on 08/22/2004 12:43:17 PM PDT by Atomic Vomit (www.aroostookbeauty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit

"I wish more ugly and disturbing "art" like that would be stolen. Ugly art debases culture."

Interesting idea. How would this be achieved? How can we define artistic beauty in such a way as to be able to immediately identify ugly art, and dispose of it?


62 posted on 08/23/2004 6:48:42 AM PDT by p1ca55o (interesting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Shouldn't the head line read stolen again?

Wasn't it stolen before and recovered?


63 posted on 08/23/2004 7:00:09 AM PDT by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage; Delbert
Delbert realised only too late he was supposed to steal the one called "The Ice Cream"

Dude, you're supposed to ping him if you're talking about him!
64 posted on 08/23/2004 7:06:07 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I'm the dandy highwayman that you're too scared to mention . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: p1ca55o
I wish. It is my desire. Please don't assume intent as in "disposing" of ugly art, once identified.

How do we achieve the reduction of ugly and pathological "art"?

I parenthesize the word "art" because such displays of torment are just projections of the performer's illness best ignored by we who have it inflicted on us. We celebrate art's beauty. It is unwise to celebrate ugliness masquerading as art.

Are we not better soothed than assaulted by art?

Do you think perhaps that as so much of modern art has become assaultive there may be a cumulative negative effect on western culture because of it?

I think covering our walls with angst is a bad idea.

I am happier for rejecting it. Who but the disturbed could not be?

AV

65 posted on 08/23/2004 7:26:53 AM PDT by Atomic Vomit (www.aroostookbeauty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Atomic Vomit

Thank you for your considered response. I understand your point.

Yet what is light without dark? How can happiness be meaningful without torment? What is beautiful when all around is beautiful?

To me ugly art is not meant to be appreciated as beautiful, but rather to provoke one to admire that which is by contrast beautiful.

Someone who enjoys ugly art may find solace in an image that embarces their own torment, like a counseller to their soul, a hope that someone, somewhere understands how you feel. Only then when this darkness is embraced, is it possible to even dream of the light ahead.


66 posted on 08/23/2004 4:27:08 PM PDT by p1ca55o (interesting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson