the mechanism, as we see is chemicals. life itself is more than chemicals. if you dont get that out of what i said, you are beyond my help. perhaps a philosophy course for thinking outside of your mindset would help?
i never once said that we dont involve chemicals. ive said time and time again that we are more than just chemicals.
how is a claim that we are more than we see without merit? we dont see it all when we look from only religious or only scientific aspects.
if it turns out that their is another possible aspect that is not chemical and design in nature, that is for YOU to present. my presentation merely states that being simple compounds in the right amounts does not make life. it is more than just that. and this i have provided for time and time again.
if it turns out that their*
*there
Instead of just repeating your belief, why don't you try supporting that assertion, if you can?
how is a claim that we are more than we see without merit?
Because it is no different than stating that "the Easter Bunny did it". A naked assertion is meaningless, a non sequitur, a fundamental exercise in illogical thinking.
You got that?
Since you've had the opportunity for multiple posts now to support your claim that "all chemicals" and design are the only alternatives but have not done so, I will take that as an admission on your part that your claim has no merit.