Instead of just repeating your belief, why don't you try supporting that assertion, if you can?
how is a claim that we are more than we see without merit?
Because it is no different than stating that "the Easter Bunny did it". A naked assertion is meaningless, a non sequitur, a fundamental exercise in illogical thinking.
You got that?
"Because it is no different than stating that "the Easter Bunny did it". A naked assertion is meaningless, a non sequitur, a fundamental exercise in illogical thinking."
pray-tell... how does a chemical reaction then become a life philosophy or even lies?
if we are only what we see, why do we not see our own thoughts? we see stimulation caused by thoughts, but these arent CAUSED to chemicals, but free will. how does free will equate with chemicals?
i know we are more than mere chemicals becuase we ask more than simply "how"
by our own design we negate science as being the one whole truth. it is a portion of the picture. it may be accurate, but it is not all inclusive.
you got that?
"Instead of just repeating your belief, why don't you try supporting that assertion, if you can?"
for the umpteenth freakin time, we are more than chemicals because otherwise we would witness life being formed and we would be able to reproduce such a simple concept if it were the full truth!