Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsi_junkie

I'm about as libertarian and pro-property rights as they come, however I do concede that I see some wisdom in zoning laws when it comes to historical neighborhoods.

There is a lot of character and neighborhood cohesiveness that can be completely undermined by one ugly, out of place home built in a historical neighborhood.


38 posted on 08/21/2004 1:14:16 PM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
"I'm about as libertarian and pro-property rights as they come, however I do concede that I see some wisdom in zoning laws when it comes to historical neighborhoods."

Amendment V

"nor shall private property be taken for public use without compensation."

If a community wants to "preserve" a historical district, then the community must compensate the private property owners for the cost to preserve the property in the manner in which the community wishes for it to preserved.

Remember the "preservation" is for "public use."

56 posted on 08/21/2004 1:44:49 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
There is a lot of character and neighborhood cohesiveness that can be completely undermined by one ugly, out of place home built in a historical neighborhood.

Historical neighborhood? Be careful what you wish for.

63 posted on 08/21/2004 1:54:35 PM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams

But where does it end? Once a government agency or body starts deciding what is historical, they'll move into what's tasteful as well. If McMansions start going up, that means property values are high. Those who object to the aesthetics can sell and live someplace else.


115 posted on 08/21/2004 4:31:04 PM PDT by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
"There is a lot of character and neighborhood cohesiveness that can be completely undermined by one ugly, out of place home built in a historical neighborhood."

One of the most charming of American towns is Eureka Springs, Arkansas. I have spent a lot of time there and never tire of it. It is set in the Ozark hills and has a Victorian flavor. Even the McDonald's is done in Victorian style. There are no stop lights anywhere in town, but the traffic still flows pretty well, even when there is a lot of it. About a year ago, they allowed a Dollar General within city limits. I'm not sure how that happened, but it is a terrible eyesore. Fortunately, it's kind of on the outskirts of town, but still. They should have put it over in Berryville near the Walmart or something.

I agree with you about the building codes. Generally I think people should have the right to do what they want to with their own property, but sometimes, especially when the attraction to a community is a certain historical or architectural flavor, that flavor should be preserved. Of course, anyone wishing to live in that community should know and agree, up front, to maintain the historical/architectural integrity of that community. The rules shouldn't always be changing and there should be some common sense room for flexibility within those guidelines.

173 posted on 08/22/2004 6:18:13 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson