Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams
"I'm about as libertarian and pro-property rights as they come, however I do concede that I see some wisdom in zoning laws when it comes to historical neighborhoods."

Amendment V

"nor shall private property be taken for public use without compensation."

If a community wants to "preserve" a historical district, then the community must compensate the private property owners for the cost to preserve the property in the manner in which the community wishes for it to preserved.

Remember the "preservation" is for "public use."

56 posted on 08/21/2004 1:44:49 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: tahiti

Precisely.


104 posted on 08/21/2004 3:59:55 PM PDT by sauropod (Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: tahiti
Remember the "preservation" is for "public use."

Sorry, but you're playing semantics and you're wrong. Do zoning laws open your house to the public? Are you required to allow strangers to come in and sleep or use the bathroom? No.

Sophistry is not a convincing argument.

124 posted on 08/21/2004 5:22:17 PM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson