[Ukiapah Heep]

Baskerville is right. Take a good look into the sewer of antidad court rulings on a case by case basis, if you have the stomach for it.

Conservatives have bought heavily into this BS also. Henry Hyde has introduced more severe legislation limiting fathers' rights than has Hillary Clinton. That goes for the Elianistas too!

[Luke]

I'm not saying Baskerville is not sincere in what he believes. His premise is wrong. Court rulings, like feminism, do not create deviate sex. It is deviate sex that has led to 'same-sex rulings'. Sin is the causative factor for humans of the same sex wanting to mate. Secular humanist look to place blame. Someone must be responsible! Right? No! Black-hearted sin is responsible. Baskerville's approach is from the secular humanist side. He refuses to see the big picture.

It is secular humanist belief that we as a society must be tolerant of others sexual desires that has led to the phrase 'same-sex marriage'. In fact there is no such thing same-sex marriage. The mind of the secular humanist denies God. Therefore humans are permitted to mate with anyone they wish.

There are no Christian courts..., no Christian judges..., no Christian politicians... only secular humanist. Just by going to work, going to school, going to the post office, going to the grocery store... even a Christian is required to live in a world of secular humanism. Study the works of Thomas Mann, John Dewey and Noah Webster to find out how and why our educators, high and low, have become secular humanist. A good starting point might be David Limbaugh's book "Persecution".