Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve in DC
A finite amount of air (or steel, or water, or whatever) has a given mass, no matter what temperature it may be.

Density can be consider to be the measure of the amount of matter within a given area. The ambient temperature is the primary determinate of the density of air. Cold air is denser the warmer air. As such, there are more "air" molecules in the area around the pendulum if the air is cooled.

So, cold air does indeed generate a stronger gravitational pull then warmer air.

However, as I pointed out originally this effect would be very very small.
24 posted on 08/21/2004 10:16:30 AM PDT by swilhelm73 (I WILL VOTE FOR GEORGE W. BUSH INSTEAD OF JOHN KERRY because I still believe in the rule of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: swilhelm73
One might suggest that the differential in mass might place more air molecules in closer proximity to the pendulum, but overall, the mass of air in the atmosphere has to be considered static for these purposes.

Regarding a change in proximal mass, and its discernable impact in the speed of the pendulum, I would suggest that the near transit of a heavy truck would have more significant gravitational impact than a slight change in air temperature, no matter how swiftly that change in temperature might occur.

(But I am too poorly schooled and too lazy to perform the calculations to support my statement:-)

27 posted on 08/21/2004 11:07:02 AM PDT by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson