Skip to comments.
NY Times graphic exposing the nefarious Swift Boat Vets. </sarcasm>
nyt ^
| research geniuses at the NYT
Posted on 08/20/2004 3:54:39 PM PDT by dennisw
For a newspaper that has ignored the Swift Vets, New York Times, they sure put a lot of time and effort into that graphic in the last weeks. How long was it in the making while nary a peep about the Swifties was in the Times?
![](http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/08/19/politics/campaign/20040820swift_graph.gif)
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; clymers; damagecontrol; dirtyttricks; dnctalkingpoints; doublestandard; georgesoros; guiltbyassociation; jumpedtheshark; kerry; kerrycampaign; lapdogs; mediabias; moveon; nyt; rattricks; smearcampaign; stampoutdissent; swiftboatveterans; unfittocommand; webofconnections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
1
posted on
08/20/2004 3:54:39 PM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
You just gotta laugh at the Times -- they are like a parody of a liberal newspaper. Did you see the chart they did about Bush's National Guard service? It was just as humorous.
2
posted on
08/20/2004 3:56:48 PM PDT
by
68skylark
To: dennisw
I thought liberals needed hard proof to consider someone guilty?
I mean, they whined that the case against Hussein was flimsy and it was WAY more solid than this stupid graph.
To: dennisw
4
posted on
08/20/2004 3:58:03 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Secularization of America)
To: dennisw
If there are any lingering doubts that the New York Times and all of the liberal publications that take their marching orders directly from her are not working exclusively for the Democrat Party, here you are. This should remove all doubt.
To: LiteKeeper
Are you SURE you didn't get this from Scrappleface or the Onion?
6
posted on
08/20/2004 3:58:40 PM PDT
by
IGOTMINE
("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
To: dennisw
Must be nice having the media on your side. What's really ironic is, I'm sure that after the election the NY Times ombudsman will release a soul-searching piece on how the Times editorial staff was not diligent enough in ferreting out the nefarious machinations of the Bush attack machine.
7
posted on
08/20/2004 3:59:14 PM PDT
by
kezekiel
To: dennisw
Are they doing one for MoveOn.org's connections to Democrats, especially Gore, Dean and Kerry?
8
posted on
08/20/2004 3:59:32 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: dennisw
Something just struck me. As I read the Internet and newspapers and watch TV, I feel like the lines are being drawn for Civil War 2.
9
posted on
08/20/2004 4:00:52 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: dennisw
Have they done a similar chart on Moveon.org?
Why did I ask?
To: dennisw
The NY Times is defending Kerry harder than any of his campaign staff is. What is wrong with this picture?
11
posted on
08/20/2004 4:01:30 PM PDT
by
Bryan24
To: dennisw
I wonder how long it would take us to work one of these up between Kerry and MoveOn.org?
Friday night fun?
12
posted on
08/20/2004 4:01:37 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Kerry being called a war hero is "a colloquialism.")
To: kezekiel
I'm shocked that some of the big guns in Texas know each other. Damn.
13
posted on
08/20/2004 4:02:33 PM PDT
by
chiller
(Kill lying liberal Old media.....turn 'em off !)
To: dennisw
I donated at their website a few moments ago. There is a delicious irony being played out here. During Viet Nam, various leftists attacked the United States and the Military because of the war. Opportunists like Poodle used it to launch his political career. For the most part since then, the veterans of the war didn't have much to say as a group, and the leftist press wouldn't have listened to them anyway. And as a matter of routine, they continued to be slandered by cheap shot TV plots and movie makers, But, now, after years of silence and being slandered by the effete leftists, the Viet Nam Veterans are fighting back and fighting hard. And the same people who defamed and cursed them once, are doing it again! But the Viet Nam Vets have a
LOT of support because of Talk Radio, and the Internet.
Merciful God in Heaven, lend these brave men your strength, and let they prevail!
To: dennisw
For one, I am appalled that republicans would support a candidate they wish to see elected. The nerve of those scoundrels. </sarcasm>
15
posted on
08/20/2004 4:02:55 PM PDT
by
IamConservative
(A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
To: dennisw
The NY Times is officially an arm of the Democrat Party.
16
posted on
08/20/2004 4:04:40 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(OJ was innocent because Mark Furhman said the "N" word.)
To: dennisw
17
posted on
08/20/2004 4:05:11 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(http://www.swiftvets.com/)
To: dennisw
I once got a letter from Karl Rove. :(
To: P-Marlowe
Yes, they have done an extensive analysis on the moveon.org relationship. Unfortunately, it is just one of John Kerry's secrets. He has this analysis hidden...in algore's lockbox.
19
posted on
08/20/2004 4:05:22 PM PDT
by
mattdono
([mattdono to John Kerry]: I voted for you...right before I voted against you.)
To: dennisw
JOHN KERRY IS DIRECTLY QUOTING MICHAEL MOORE IN HIS CAMPAIGN SPEECHES.
I didn't see the NYT drawing any arrows there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson