To: governsleastgovernsbest
Isn't it, uh, sorta understood that the Swifties probably wouldn't be funded by, you know ... Democrats?
Sheesh. Old media is so lame.
3 posted on
08/20/2004 4:42:59 AM PDT by
The G Man
(LOL ---> "John Quixote and his Magical Cambodian Mystery Tour")
To: The G Man
"Isn't it, uh, sorta understood that the Swifties probably wouldn't be funded by, you know ... Democrats?"
Exactly. Funny, but I haven't heard the morning shows breathlessly report that Move.on's ads are funded by Democrats.
To: The G Man
FOXNews reported that although the ads were initially funded by rich Texas Republicans, the money is pouring in via their internet website. Ordinary folks are continuing these ads.......
5 posted on
08/20/2004 4:47:06 AM PDT by
tioga
(Flush the johns in '04!)
To: The G Man
I believe that some of the Swifties
are Dems, however.
Sounds like non-denial denials all around this morning.
11 posted on
08/20/2004 4:50:43 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: The G Man
It's my belief that when Jf'K got home from Vietnam and began spewing venom while our guys were over there he turned many into Republicans.
When I saw my then young Navy LT husband ordered to wear his civilian clothes to Pentagon and remove his uniform because of all the harrassment from protesters (lead by Guess-Who), it made US BOTH Republicans!
12 posted on
08/20/2004 4:51:16 AM PDT by
rightazrain
("John, go to your room!," the Portuguese Martha Mitchell screeched.)
To: The G Man
LOL. I noticed that glaringly obvious point also. Like, moveon.org is supported by (gasp!) democrats!
This tact of "yeah but, look who's behind it" is ineffective with real people when they don't refute the actual charges.
45 posted on
08/20/2004 6:14:29 AM PDT by
MNnice
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson