Posted on 08/19/2004 9:27:50 PM PDT by Steven W.
CLELAND: ...Ill get shot three times, and Im going to bring that shrapnel home so I can be a war hero.
BROWN: He literally got shot. Theres no question about any of those things. So what else is there to discuss? How much he got shot, how deep, how much shrapnel?
MALKIN: ... Why dont people ask him more specific questions about the shrapnel in his leg. They are legitimate questions about whether or not it was a self-inflicted wound.
MATTHEWS: What do you mean by self-inflicted? Are you saying he shot himself on purpose? Is that what youre saying?
MALKIN: Did you read the book...
MATTHEWS: Im asking a simple question. Are you saying that he shot himself on purpose.
MALKIN: Im saying some of these soldiers...
MATTHEWS: And Im asking question.
MALKIN: And Im answering it.
MATTHEWS: Did he shoot himself on purpose.
MALKIN: Some of the soldiers have made allegations that these were self-inflicted wounds.
MATTHEWS: No one has ever accused him of shooting himself on purpose.
MALKIN: That these were self-inflicted wounds.
MATTHEWS: Your saying there arehe shot himself on purpose, thats a criminal act?
MALKIN: Im saying that Ive read the book and some of the...
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: I want an answer yes or no, Michelle.
MALKIN: Some of the veterans say...
MATTHEWS: No. No one has every accused him of shooting himself on purpose.
MALKIN: Yes. Some of them say that.
MATTHEWS: Tell me where that...
MALKIN: Self-inflicted woundsin February, 1969.
MATTHEWS: This is not a show for this kind of talk. Are you accusing him of shooting himself on purpose to avoid combat or to get credit?
...
MATTHEWS: I have never heard anyone say he shot himself on purpose.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
I never watch Mattews but watched him tonight, what a seething petty man he is
I just heard Keith Ohlbermann say that Michelle made a fool of herself on Chrissies show. They are all working for the DNC and it's disgusting.
Seriously, Kerry's people and their buddies in the press are seriously mishandling this story.
Notice the Clinton people have vanished. When did we last see Lanny?
I wonder if Christine was angry that Michelle chided him for his interogation (her word and quite accurate) of the Swift Boat Veteran --- Hell hath no fury like a woman! (or girlie-man in Christine Matthew's case)
In other words, Chris definitely got the fax ;)
Let's see, Kerry was the Swift Vet FU and was shooting a grenade launcher at a beach too close to his own position.
He caught a piece of his own grenade. That is what the medic said. It was a piece of our type grenades.
Kerry was able to lie to get a PH for it, after being denied it by the people that knew what happened.
DK
I just saw the end of the show. She should have been able to correct Chrissy about shooting vs. a hand grenade.
And Chris Matthews is up to his old DNC misdirection tricks where he puts things in people's mouths: "Are you saying Bill and Hillary personally murdered Vince Foster? Is that what you're saying? That's crazy conspiracy talk! I'm not going to stand for it!"
they regrouped. Lanny was good to throw out there at first, being so experienced & all. He panned (persona and arguments just too reminiscent of the Clinton scandal defenses ... remember "protective function priviilege"). He may be back but, for now, they're having to go with "plan b".
exactly ... we've seen this movie before. the SwiftVets are battle hardened men of honor - they won't be intimidated by loose tongue rhetoric or killing of cats (remembering Kathleen Willey's former pet Bullseye)
Kerry frags himself and Chris M is the one who ends up with
PTSD. Who woulda thunk?
Chris Matthews thinks he is cute. He's playing a little game. Trying to twist what Thurlow was saying. It always helps when you have a rapid fire mouth and won't let a person finish their thought. He did it with Malkin as well. You could see the delight in his eyes. Michelle did a good she could but he needs to be up against a really formidable debater like Medved.
So a quick post before bed, but I'm going to say Matthews HASN'T read the book.
I haven't either, but I'm not on Nat'l TV debating it, as he shouldn't be either without reading the book first.
Its my understanding he was extremely hostile to Michelle Malkin the whole time she was on. Loser.
Malkin is confused and she needs to get her facts straight before her lack of clarity hurts the vets. The Swifties charge that Kerry's wounds are "self-inflicted," in the accidental sense, i.e., he got hit by the shrapnel of his own grenade. Nobody is saying that Kerry purposely shot himself to obtain a medal. Matthews used this to create a straw man.
Kerry: "Waaah! Why are you questioning my Vietnam service?"
Citizen: "Well John, what else do you want to talk about?"
Kerry: "I don`t know..Uuumm...Hey, did you know I was in Vietnam?"
This has been going around in circles the whole time this idiot has been campaigning. That`s what he based his Senate career on! " I am a Vietnam vet, and other Vietnam Vets kill babies" Now it`s "I am a Vietnam Vet and a war hero" WHAT THE HELL ELSE DOES THIS IDIOT RUN ON? NOTHING!! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!
Look...This is from his own website...
http://www.johnkerry.com/front/splash.html
Front page: "Make history with us"
Make history about what? What the hell is he talking about? Again like I said, NOTHING!
Then you get to the main page where it has "A stronger America"..Then guess what he talks about? I WAS IN VIETNAM!!! AAAAAAAUUUGHH!!!!!!!!
Malkin needs to stick to what she knows... illegal immigration!
Kerry received at least two PH's erroneously because the "wounds" were not received during enemy contact! And at least one of them was because he like Max Cleland screwed up!!! Shrapnel from your own grenade should not get you a PH!... duuuhhhhhhhh
There was never a Plan A. Knowing that Kerry is a control freak, he likely wanted things done "his way" and pulled in his chips from the Times/Globe axis of a-holes and buddies in the WaPo. Rather unusual for The Times to run a huge story, thrown it on the net before it was properly edited unless someone was doing a prop for Kerry. It is transparent. The WaPo is an obvious drive-by character assassination. I'm curious why the FOIA request was done--and what the original intent was.
However, for a plan this does not make. Those cable shows are only watched by the converted of both sides. I have a sense these cable shows serve occasionally as a testing ground for each side to see what argument plays well and what actually is out there regarding a particular story.
The campaign people brought in are only making more of a mess. They have no idea what they are doing. John Kerry does not know what he is doing, and the mediots REALLY are clueless in this regard.
Now that everyone's attention is focused on this, here comes Senate Testimony, Winter Soldier, Dewey Canyon and probably a clear summation of a meeting between Kerry and the the NV delegation to the Paris Peace Talks.
Thank you for clarifying. That's what I thought it meant as well--see my post #33. Matthews is playing a little game. I wish Malkin would have been more clear but I understand it's hard when you are up against a mouth. I know she knows the facts but Matthews did the dirty on her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.