To: Pharmboy
There not white...White people are not semetic
9 posted on
08/19/2004 7:31:56 PM PDT by
missyme
To: missyme
It's They're not white, not There not white. Enough said...buh-bye.
11 posted on
08/19/2004 7:34:43 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
To: missyme
Semetic people are Caucasion, as are Persians and people from the Indian subcontinent.
We vary in skin tone -- some are quite light, others dark (like Italians or Greeks), others much darker -- like Arabs. But all would be classified as "Caucasion" or "white."
To: missyme
Oh...one more thing: it's semitic not semetic. You're welcome (note: not your welcome).
13 posted on
08/19/2004 7:36:58 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
To: missyme
There are
THREEE and ONLY
THREE races,with quite a number of sub-groupings.Semites
ARE WHITE,but all whites are NOT Semites.
You're dead wrong on the DNA thing and dead wrong on this.
To: missyme; Pharmboy
There not white...White people are not semetic
You're both arguing due to misused words -- white <> Caucasian and white <> Aryan/Indo-European.
Semites are Caucasian. Semites are not Indo-European. White-skinned folks can be Indo-European or Semitic or Dravidian or Finno-Ugaritic (all Caucasian people), they can also be Turkic-Mongol folks (Turks for example)
The terms "white" or "black" or "brown" is hardly a scientific differentiation or else Iranis (from Aryan land viz. Iran) would be mostly brown skinned and those folks who got a deep tan would seemingly change from "white" to "brown".
186 posted on
08/19/2004 10:34:43 PM PDT by
Cronos
(W2K4)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson