Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
"Sands of the sea" would mean vast, a significant percent of a world population. I divided 5 million Jews by 6 billion world population and got a number in scientific notation.

It would be logical and historically accurate to say that the population would have been assimilated into neighbouring, similar groups, especially considering that the northerners were actually worshipping the gods of their neighbours and probably intermingling.

If the House of Israel was absorbed into a surrounding populations, then how can Israel and Judah reconcile?

455 posted on 08/20/2004 10:09:17 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
"Sands of the sea" would mean vast, a significant percent of a world population. I divided 5 million Jews by 6 billion world population and got a number in scientific notation

Well,
  1. firstly, "Sands of the sea" woudl mean a large number of people, it doesn't say anything about they being a percentage of a larger number of people.
  2. Secondly, the number of worldwide Jewry is 24 million

457 posted on 08/20/2004 10:24:36 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson