Posted on 08/18/2004 9:46:20 AM PDT by jayef
The passing of Ronald Reagan produced an emotional tribute to the former president from Dan Rather, anchoring the CBS Evening News on June 5. Rather appeared to choke up at the end of the broadcast after describing Reagan's impressive life and career. This reaction to Reagan's death may reflect awareness, even in this crusty veteran liberal news anchor, that a truly great American who had changed history for the better had passed from the scene. But while many journalists went back in history to analyze and comment on Reagan's extraordinary political career, they left out the name of one of Reagan's most prominent adversariesSenator John Kerry of Massachusetts.
Kerry's statement in honor of President Reagan mentioned that he "shaped one of the greatest victories of freedom." This was the victory over Soviet-style communism. The Senator conveniently forgot to mention that he was on the wrong side of this epic struggle. But in a press release distributed to the media, Cliff Kincaid, editor of the AIM Report, charged that what was missing from the media's extensive coverage of Reagan was a factual account of how Kerry tried to sabotage the former president's pro-freedom policies in Central America.
The media recognized how Reagan contributed to the collapse of Soviet communism but not how Kerry used his position in the U.S. Senate to protect Soviet advances in the Western hemisphere. One of Reagan's main adversaries in the Senate at the time, Kerry tried to undermine the "Reagan Doctrine" of supporting anti-communist freedom fighters, known as the Contras, in Nicaragua.
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
Subversion is what Kerry does best. First he subversively helped the Vietnam communists. Then he helped the Soviet communists by supporting a nuke freeze. Then he helped the Latin american communists.
I am noticing a pattern here.
Yeah, but he has now come out in favor of troops in Germany and South Korea, so give the guy a break. He's evolving, in a slow and nuanced kind of way.
With self promotion not far behind. I don't trust a man who wants to be president before he has become a father.
It is sort of hard to see the light when your head is up your a$$, I suppose...
Yup.
I don't trust a man who doesn't know what side he's on half the time.
Well actually, I'm sure he's on John Kerry's side all the time.
Yeah, but don't forget he ran guns to anti-communist forces in Cambodia.
C'mon, don't you see that his pretending to be soft on communism was just a cover?

Does that mean that Kerry has gravitas without the quagmire?
Now that I could probably believe.
He was for the quagmire before he was against it.
"I don't trust a man who doesn't know what side he's on half the time."
;}
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.