Posted on 08/17/2004 2:38:57 PM PDT by unspun
By The Leader-Chicago Bureau (admin@illinoisleader.com)
CHICAGO -- Republican U.S. Senate candidate Alan Keyes has just released a statement clarifying what appeared to be a surprising position he took at a news conference yesterday.
"I think a cogent argument could be made for reparations in principle," Keyes is quoted as saying to reporters yesterday, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.
The Chicago Tribune expanded:
Keyes gave a brief tutorial on Roman history and said that in regard to reparations for slavery, the U.S. should do what the Romans did: "When a city had been devastated [in the Roman empire], for a certain length of time--a generation or two--they exempted the damaged city from taxation."Keyes proposed that for a generation or two, African-Americans of slave heritage should be exempted from federal taxes--federal because slavery "was an egregious failure on the part of the federal establishment."
The response from conservatives was immediate. "Who downstate will now vote for Keyes?" wrote IllinoisLeader.com reader Randall Mead of Springfield today. "I certainly won't."
This afternoon, Keyes released the following statement, clarifying his position:
I have consistently opposed the effort to extort monetary damages from the American people. As I have argued in the past, the great sacrifices involved in the Civil War represented the requital in blood and treasure for the terrible injustices involved in slavery. In this form the so called "reparations" movement represents an insult to the historic commitment that many Americans made to the end of slavery, which included the sacrifice of their lives.I have also consistently maintained that the history of slavery, racial segregation and discrimination did real damage to black Americans, left real and persistent material wounds in need of healing.
In various ways through the generations since the end of slavery, America has tried to address this objective fact, but without real success. This was at least in part the rational for many elements of the Great Society programs of the sixties, and for the original and proper concept of affirmative action developed under Republican leadership during the Nixon years.
Unfortunately, the government-dominated approaches of the Great Society, which purported to heal and repair the legacy of historical damage, actually widened and deepened the wounds. They undermined the moral foundations of the black community and seriously corrupted the family structure and the incentives to work, savings, investment, and business ownership.
The idea I have often put forward to address this challenge involves a traditionally Republican, conservative and market-oriented approach: removing the tax burden from the black community for a generation or two in order to encourage business ownership, create jobs and support the development of strong economic foundations for working families.
This has the advantage of letting people help themselves, rather then pouring money into government bureaucracies that displace and discourage their own efforts. It takes no money from other citizens, while righting the historic imbalance that results from the truth that black slaves toiled for generations at a tax rate that was effectively 100 percent.
I have also made it clear that while I believe that the descendants of slaves would be helped by this period of tax relief, my firm goal and ultimate objective is to replace the income tax, and thereby free all Americans from this insidious form of tax slavery. It is well known that this is one of the key priorities of the Keyes campaign.
In response to Keyes' statement, conservative Jack Roeser of Family Taxpayers Network told IllinoisLeader.com, "I expect Keyes would say this is one of those interesting subjects to be talked about among people sharing ideas. Reparations is an impractical concept. Everybody in every category has been wronged in one or the other, and you cannot single one out."
Roeser continued, "Keyes is a man of ideas, and I expect he gets into discussions like this that are proper in their proper place, but that he would never vote for reparations. The problem with American politics is that people don't get into deep discussions."
© 2004 IllinoisLeader.com -- all rights reserved
______What are your thoughts concerning the issues raised in this story? Write a letter to the editor at letters@illinoisleader.com and include your name and town.
Now I'm beginning to realize why's he renting his Illinois apartment on a month-by-month basis.
I guess it's that he wants to ultimately abolish the income tax for all. But, of course, he's not proposing that *that* immediately happen; he just wants reparations now.
Is there anything Keyes can say that his supporters won't defend? Supporting reparations is not a conservative idea, no matter how much his fans try to spin it.
contextualizing = backpeddaling = spinning = getting foot out of mouth
No.
Yup. Restore the Republic - repeal the 16th and 17th.
Maybe I didn't read it right the first time, but it sounds to me like he's standing by his proposal. I think backpedaling would be an improvement at this point.
BUMP!
This is exactly what he has been saying all along, since this news broke out. Do you think that Keyes doesn't want this tax freedom to exist for African-Americans and not for the rest of us, too, ASAP?
You won't hope Obama wins, when (if) he's pushing European Socialism and moral decadence left and left in the US Senate.
Hm, it appears (so far) that none of the anti-Keyes folks even read this statement let alone bothered to understand it.
Ah well. Lead a horse to water, but...
Well, then, why don't you explain it to us?
Make me drink, k2. I'm all ears.
LOL! He said the same thing (the short version) on CNN's Crossfire this afternoon. I just checked & the transcript isn't up yet. When it is, I'll post it or a link.
The farther folks like Obama push the Democrats to the left, the more room in the center (not that I want the center - only yellow stripes and roadkill there...). Nancy Pelosi has probably done almost as much good for Republicans as the Contract with America did.
I like ending "tax slavery" but this has to be most polarzing, revolting and potentially divisive method Alan Keyes could possibly come up with.
Thanks, Catspaw. I don't speak "Keyes", so I need all the help I can get.
But he's not proposing that the income tax be removed *now* on all Americans; he's only proposing it for black people. That's called reparations, and that's something no conservative should ever support.
Actually this is not backpedaling at all, this is brilliant, because it diffuses the entire reparations argument.
Tax relieft is fundamentally different from giving people money, because tax relief encourages people to work harder (you can't get tax relief unless you have income that can be taxed), while giving people money encourages them to not work.
What this also does is that is gets the minority communities to support TAX CUTS, which they *NEVER* do.
And you know what the next step is? After they get their tax cuts for a while, the debate becomes, should we raise the taxes minorities so that they pay the same as everyone else, or should be cut taxes for everyone else to get them to the same rate as the minorities. Now, the Dems, who wants to raise taxes, will want to raise taxes on the minorities, and the Republicans, will be the ones who say, no, we don't want to raise taxes on anyone, this will get the minories to vote for the people who won't raise *their* taxes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.