To: Valin
"If memory servers, the general in charge said she didn't know this sort of thing was going on. Well it was her job to know what's going on. That's why she got the perks that come with being a general."
She was in charge of all the prisons and was not present at Abu Ghraib. A colonel in Army intelligence was there and was in charge of that prison. This is why so many people thought it strange that the only leader to get in trouble for the incident was the MP general who was not present, when it was the Army intelligence colonel who should have known what was happening because he was present.
11 posted on
08/17/2004 9:59:43 AM PDT by
monday
To: monday
She was in charge of all the prisons and was not present at Abu Ghraib. A colonel in Army intelligence was there and was in charge of that prison.
You're right.
I just hope we don't see a whitewash of this. Thst would be yet one more gift to the terrorists.
13 posted on
08/17/2004 10:03:40 PM PDT by
Valin
(Mind like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson