Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'YOU DIDN'T ONLY LIE TO ME, SCOTT, YOU LIED TO A NATION'
The NY POST ^ | Aug 17,2004 | Howard Breuer

Posted on 08/17/2004 5:31:58 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-490 next last
To: drjulie

Don't they have a pattern of suddenly seeking psychiatric hospitalization for some "crisis" as soon as they realize they are about to be in big trouble for some antic or other? The doctor who wrote that book said they would stay safely in the psychiatric ward till the police would ease up on the charge (which was usually a misdemeanor)... then the psychopaths suddenly discover they're "sane" and they start aggressively telling their doctor they "don't belong in here with all these seriously insane people". Of course, that was under the old system where they actually hospitalized psychiatric patients!

Anyway, Mark Hacking comes to mind, but who knows what that nut is really like?


441 posted on 08/17/2004 9:32:43 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Jackie-O

Good night ladies!


442 posted on 08/17/2004 9:34:13 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

Stop it, you're killing me!!!!!!!

My husband loves that commercial. And tonight he said there was actually some sexual enhancement product commercial where the man is shown holding... are you ready for this... a Vienna sausage.


443 posted on 08/17/2004 9:35:50 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don't know if he'll ever get another piece of tail BUT if he were acquitted (PERISH THE THOUGHT), he might not get the chance. I don't know if Dennis Rocha or Ron Frey wouldn't be prepared to "take him out"!! IF it's a hung jury, he WON'T get bail because he is an OBVIOUS flight risk AND the Prosecution will have the charges RE-filed before he could change clothes. I wouldn't be surprised if they already had the paper work done, only needing to be dated and filed.!! I even heard Pixley once, state that Scott would NOT be granted bail if it were a hung jury verdict.


444 posted on 08/17/2004 9:36:28 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage; Devil_Anse

You know maybe we are totally mis understanding his obsession or what looks like obscession for Amber.

Maybe his whole motive for persuing Amber was to somehow try to thwart her testimony against him. I mean who else got to know Scott except Amber without her testimony there would be not be as compelling.

Even the things he's implyed to her, like "were you involved in laci's disapearance?, etc.


445 posted on 08/17/2004 9:37:30 PM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

LOL - YUP some big burly biker might choose him for his girlfriend!!


446 posted on 08/17/2004 9:38:16 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz

That is such a very smart insight, juzcuz. He was doing what some people sometimes do when a divorce is ongoing. The "reconciliation" re-shuffles the cards, and the set-up person might have had an advantage before it, but not after it.

Either that or he was going to sink her in that lake.

Oh, and they played part of a tape from about Feb. 18. Scott at that point sounds like he is really, really coming unhinged. I can't help but think that if they'd just persevered a bit longer, he might have cracked, even if there were no actual get-together.


447 posted on 08/17/2004 9:41:24 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

WHY do these CTV anchors KEEP having this MORON on their shows??? I've HAD IT. I'm sending emails EVERYWHERE. I think it's outright CORRUPT for this idiot to be able to keep speaking about the case and frankly, admitting that he is DISCUSSING it with some of the Jurors? By some of Jurors I think it will be shown to be #6!! They were described as friends remember. This is starting to SMELL ROTTEN!! It's really the Court that ought to be dealing with this.


448 posted on 08/17/2004 9:43:13 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

Yes, I'm pretty sure they have been entered into evidence. I'm wondering if it was during the Prelim? I'm going to search that out for you. Give me till tomorrow.


449 posted on 08/17/2004 9:45:01 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

NO!! Janey Peterson takes the cake in the repulsive and ignorant arena.


450 posted on 08/17/2004 9:47:35 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

YES indeed. WHY??? I think the reasons were two fold, one he wanted to get her back in the sack, and two he wanted to try and keep her on his side. He wanted to manipulate her into supporting him as being innocent. And also, he was damn well obsessed with this girl and still is!!


451 posted on 08/17/2004 9:52:29 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
.....some sexual enhancement product commercial where the man is shown holding... are you ready for this... a Vienna sausage.

I sure hope he was holding it and not sucking the insides out of the sausage.
Like I do when I eat a sausage. Oh! Oh! What am I saying. I really do mean when I eat a vienna sausage. Sheeeeh! I better just shut up. :-)

452 posted on 08/17/2004 9:56:31 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Whatever Geragos is going to do you can be sure heis going be dramatic. I just hope it backfires in his face. I think it was Feiger that said, he'll blow up his own case IF he accuses Amber of murder. Geragos apparently has a witness that is supposed to say WHAT? Honestly, I just don't remember.


453 posted on 08/17/2004 9:59:10 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O

Nite Jackie. My eyes are doing the same. I keep trying to catch up to the rest of you but can't seem to get there.


454 posted on 08/17/2004 10:05:29 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Good night Meg!!


455 posted on 08/17/2004 10:07:44 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
"Geragos apparently has a witness that is supposed to say WHAT? Honestly, I just don't remember."

If I recall correctly it was someone who was going to say Scott's and Laci's marriage was on the rocks and they were going to get a divorce after the baby was born.

456 posted on 08/17/2004 10:08:19 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz

Very good points juz!! Thank God Amber was smart enough to not fall for that one.


457 posted on 08/17/2004 10:14:58 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

It is corrupt, you're right. It shows what desperate whores the media outlets are.

He has absolutely nothing to contribute. He only heard a short amount of testimony. Guaranteed, he's not studying up on the transcripts every day. So he knows nothing.

But then, it's obvious that he didn't know much to begin with.


458 posted on 08/17/2004 10:15:00 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Thanks, I'd love to read through them!


459 posted on 08/17/2004 10:15:57 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Well, I was talking about Janey Weintraub, but they're both pretty disgusting!


460 posted on 08/17/2004 10:16:55 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-490 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson