Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Have a Question???????????

Posted on 08/16/2004 10:18:30 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Use It Or Lose It
Can anyone explain why Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace (Kessler/O'Neill's Group) was not allowed to testify before the Senate Committee at which Kerry made his allegations in 1971?

I believe O'Neill was told that they didn't have room for any additional witnesses.

21 posted on 08/16/2004 10:55:24 AM PDT by Dolphy (Support swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
However, I did take part in free fire zones and I did take part in harassment interdiction fire.

Question to you combat vets about the term "interdiction fire":

I always thought interdiction fire was done by a weapons system capable of indirect fire, ie. artillery, aircraft, etc., the idea being to deny the enemy the ability to move men & supplies through a given area. If I am right, just how is this done with the weapons that Lt. Kerry had available to him on his Swift Boat? His heaviest weapon was a twin .50 (which is a direct fire weapon) or possible a grenade launcher (rather short range for interdiction fire). Just wondering what he might have meant since Sen. Kerry considered that activity a "war crime" until fairly recently.

22 posted on 08/16/2004 11:08:03 AM PDT by Tallguy (If Clinton did a good job stopping the Millenium Bomber, I've got 2 Towers in NYC to sell you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob
This is strictly between the Swifties and kerry.

Exactly

23 posted on 08/16/2004 11:11:07 AM PDT by Mo1 (Kerry & Edwards .... they will leave no Special Interest Group behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob
The Republican party isn't getting involved in this in any way at all. To me, that's the best way to go. This is strictly between the Swifties and kerry.

Exactly. And Bush shouldn't even touch the topic unless asked a direct question in, say, a press conference. Then he should say he does not have any knowledge of where the truth lies, and each voter must make his/her own mind up on it.

24 posted on 08/16/2004 11:39:43 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Help the Swifties get their spot on the air!

Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

25 posted on 08/16/2004 11:39:49 AM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
Kerry had knowlege of Hague, and Geneva Conventions...
before he didn't have knowledge of them....Kerry-esque.
26 posted on 08/16/2004 11:45:52 AM PDT by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
As I understand it, 25th Division ROE, a free fire zone was an area where you did not need permission to return fire when fired up on. Harassment and Interdiction fire was that which placed areas of likely enemy activity in a Free Fire zone under fire, artillery mostly.

A Free Fire zone was Indian Territory, such as War Zone C and D for example. This BS about Free fire zones galls my kybes, if it was enemy controlled, as defined by the RVN Provence Chief and US LNO it was free fire if not you had to ask permission to return fire.

27 posted on 08/16/2004 12:30:32 PM PDT by Little Bill (John F'n Kerry is a self promoting scumbag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

#11 Well said indeed.


28 posted on 08/16/2004 12:38:14 PM PDT by Boazo (LOSE THE TAG LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Williams
What I have heard from the swiftboat vets (might be in the book) is that Kerry thought a free fire zone meant that you shot at anything you saw there.

There are witnesses to him shooting animals in a vacated village and burning down the huts there for no apparent reason.

Neither of these are 'actionable' however they are inappropriate activities.
29 posted on 08/16/2004 3:17:39 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: evets

HA! HA! HA ...that's good! :-)


30 posted on 08/16/2004 8:24:02 PM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson