Replies

I haven't been here long enough to know if it is a FReeper thread or not. And I haven't looked. But the information is out all over the place. It was when he was with the VVAW, they had a meeting somewhere out in the mid west. The VVAW moved the meetings several times to avoid the FBI before actually having the meetings. The meetings went on for a couple of days.

Kerry or a spokesman said he was not present at the meetings, but witnesses place him there and there may be other information that link him to it. For instance the FBI files that the reporter gave to the Kerry campaign that he had gotten through the FOIA, or other records.

Anyway, the topic of the meetings was a plan to assassinate 9 US Senators during an anti-war rally in DC. The plan was for members of the VVAW to go to the Senators offices and meet with them and shot them. The plan was voted down.
However, if Kerry was present than that in itself is probably against the law. Conspiracy to assassinate an elected US Senator is against the law, just talking about it and working on a plan and voting on it is illegal. Not a lawyer, but I would guess that it is treason, we were at war.

Kerry or a spokesman said he was not present at the meetings, but witnesses place him there and there may be other information that link him to it. For instance the FBI files that the reporter gave to the Kerry campaign that he had gotten through the FOIA, or other records.

The way I understand it, the Kerry camp denied that he was present at the meeting where the vote took place on whether or not to go forward with the assasinations. Then a man who had gotten ahold of some FBI documents through a FOI request came forward with FBI files placing Kerry at the meeting. At that point, the Kerry camp changed their story to: if the FBI says he was there, then he was there.

Now, if GWB had been involved in anything remotely similar, the mainstream media would be screaming bloody murder. Since it's Kerry, they won't even mention it.