[alnick]

Kerry or a spokesman said he was not present at the meetings, but witnesses place him there and there may be other information that link him to it. For instance the FBI files that the reporter gave to the Kerry campaign that he had gotten through the FOIA, or other records.

The way I understand it, the Kerry camp denied that he was present at the meeting where the vote took place on whether or not to go forward with the assasinations. Then a man who had gotten ahold of some FBI documents through a FOI request came forward with FBI files placing Kerry at the meeting. At that point, the Kerry camp changed their story to: if the FBI says he was there, then he was there.

Now, if GWB had been involved in anything remotely similar, the mainstream media would be screaming bloody murder. Since it's Kerry, they won't even mention it.

[stockpirate]

>>>> The way I understand it, the Kerry camp denied that he was present at the meeting where the vote took place on whether or not to go forward with the assasinations. Then a man who had gotten ahold of some FBI documents through a FOI request came forward with FBI files placing Kerry at the meeting. At that point, the Kerry camp changed their story to: if the FBI says he was there, then he was there.

Now, if GWB had been involved in anything remotely similar, the mainstream media would be screaming bloody murder. Since it's Kerry, they won't even mention it.
<<<<

If he was there than a crime was commited, unless he was the undercover source for the FBI!!!

[Kackikat]

Kerry's past behavior scares the BJeeesssusss out of me, that man is dangerous. There is no telling what he was involved in that is not known.

His flip-flops would be reason enough not to vote for him. AND his opinion of the UN should scare the he%$ out of anyone in government, and the voters.

[Kackikat]

I do not believe Kerry would ever be undercover source for FBI, his testifying against war makes me believe he was male Fonda....pure activist.