Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I don't know Blam.  I'm extremely under impressed with China.  Without the U.S. it would still be a 97% oxcart nation.  If they were so important and creative and gifted, why were they still in the utilitarian stage when many many other societies are well ensconced in the 21st Century?  Why are they continually puffing up their chest when other nations are content to be who they are.  They just come off as a children.

China is nothing more than a petulant child still sucking at the tit of it's proxy mother, and frankly that mother has been a little too nurturing and woefully lacking in using her back-hand at the appropriate moment.
7 posted on 08/11/2004 6:24:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
"I don't know Blam. I'm extremely under impressed with China. Without the U.S. it would still be a 97% oxcart nation. "

Ancient China, 5-15,000 years ago.

8 posted on 08/11/2004 6:28:14 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

China has plans to build as many as 32 large 1,000-megawatt nuclear power reactors over the next 16 years.


11 posted on 08/11/2004 6:37:46 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Alan Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson