Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times' Objectivity Challenged in FTC Complaint
GOPUSA ^ | August 11, 2004 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 08/11/2004 7:40:39 AM PDT by jmstein7

A Hofstra law student has filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission against the New York Times alleging the publication's use of the slogan, "All the news that's fit to print" is false advertising and constitutes a deceptive practice. He claims that the Times' use of "push-polling" is a violation of the FTC Act.

Jonathan Stein said he filed the complaint because he believes the NYT has abused its power and abdicated its responsibility to be objective.

He told Talon News, "The New York Times has enormous power to shape public opinion and the FTC must review the paper's claim that it is an objective news source."

He accused the NYT of using "push-polling" to obtain results that support a particular position or affect public opinion with the wording of the questions. Stein claimed that the paper has been "weighting" poll numbers so that the results slant in favor of liberals and Democrats. He said that multipliers are applied to the samples that unfairly skew the outcome, consistently giving Democratic responses more weight, and Republicans less weight.

Stein asserts that news articles generated using the tainted results mislead its vast reader base. Besides its daily circulation of 1.13 million, NYT Company also publishes The Boston Globe and 16 other newspapers; owns eight network-affiliated television stations and two New York radio stations; and has more than 40 web sites, including NYTimes.com and Boston.com. Columns appearing in the NYT are syndicated throughout this extensive media network.

Additionally, the NYT's unique position as "the newspaper of record" influences news coverage across the country. Network and cable news anchors tend to lead with stories substantively taken from the newspaper's front page. Stein says that the reach of the NYT and its incalculable power to influence the marketplace of information and ideas "evince a media juggernaut beyond that of any other single information source in existence."

He says that for this reason, "The sheer power of the NYT to influence opinions all over the world, covert editorial bias at the NYT threatens to poison the entire worldwide stream of information."

In a July 25, 2004 editorial published in the NYT, Daniel Okrent, the paper's Public Editor, poses the seemingly rhetorical question of whether the NYT is a liberal newspaper. His answer was "of course it is."

Stein says that Okrent's explicit admission of liberal bias was buried in section 4, page 2 of the paper -- hardly a prominent position and hardly enough to alert potential readers or a passerby who may only read or see the front page headline that the NYT is not an objective hard-news product but an admittedly biased source of information presented with subjective liberal bias.

He says that the slogan "All the News that's Fit to Print" considerably exacerbates the misleading and deceptive notion of objectivity. Viewers of news shows and web sites that repeat stories from the pages of the NYT, along with the news anchors selecting the stories, are equally deceived. Stein concludes that the entire stream of information reaching the public, and informing public opinion, is deceptively poisoned and polluted by covert subjectivity masquerading as objectivity.

His complaint is similar to one filed on July 19, 2004 by MoveOn.org and Common Cause against Fox News' use of the phrase "Fair and Balanced."

Earlier this year, Stein filed an ethics complaint against Sen. John Kerry and Secretary of the Senate Emily Reynolds over the payment of unearned salary to the Massachusetts senator in spite of his absence from the chamber for much of 2004. The Senate Ethics Committee recently dismissed his complaint.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: ftc; jonathanstein; mediabias; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2004 7:40:41 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Silly. This is the type of nonsense I expect of the left.


2 posted on 08/11/2004 7:44:35 AM PDT by The G Man (This election is a choice between a War on Terror and a Negotiation with Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

What's good for the goose. . .


3 posted on 08/11/2004 7:45:53 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Jmstein7, that wouldn't be you who is described in the article, would it? If so, bravo.


4 posted on 08/11/2004 7:47:54 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

I think he's satirizing the MoveOn.org complaint against Fox News.


5 posted on 08/11/2004 7:48:19 AM PDT by ScottFromSpokane (Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

I don't think it's silly at all. In fact, it's about freaking time. But, I'm not sure how much good it's going to do...


6 posted on 08/11/2004 7:49:02 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

Bingo.


7 posted on 08/11/2004 7:49:10 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Yeah, I know. But didn't they toss that suit about FOX news though? If so, it seems like a waste of your time.


8 posted on 08/11/2004 7:49:57 AM PDT by The G Man (This election is a choice between a War on Terror and a Negotiation with Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Well, seeing how Don'tMoveon.org did the same thing to Fox News, it is only fair to give the New York Slimes a little bit of heat.


9 posted on 08/11/2004 7:52:16 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (I Annoy Buchananites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Is it a satire? I can't tell. The source is Talon News. If it is satirical, then you got me...


10 posted on 08/11/2004 7:52:58 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24
FTC should not be in the business of controlling the editorial content of newspapers, or TV shows. If the NYT or FoxNews or the Washington Times want to say something, that is their right!

But I do agree that media monopolies are a bad thing. It tends to homogenize the news. I think forcing the New York Times & Time-Warner to divest themselves of certain media properties is a good idea. The country benefits when there is competition in the marketplace of ideas.

11 posted on 08/11/2004 7:53:30 AM PDT by Teplukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

No, they haven't entertained it yet.

Now the libs have a problem... if their move against Fox succeeds, then it will create a precedent that will allow my claim to succeed. And, a victory against the NYT is a far greater victory than one against Fox.


12 posted on 08/11/2004 7:54:17 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Teplukin

Polls aren't editorial when they claim to be unbiased.


13 posted on 08/11/2004 7:54:25 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24; All

The complaint copy is available for signature to download and send here on FR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1184968/posts


14 posted on 08/11/2004 8:05:12 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; JohnHuang2; The Sailor; kjfine; Old Sarge; USAF_TSgt; darkwing104; ...

BUMP!


15 posted on 08/11/2004 8:06:27 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cwiz24
Polls aren't editorial when they claim to be unbiased.

I agree.

My problem with the Times is not its liberalism. It is that it has a liberal bias, while pretending to be objective.

16 posted on 08/11/2004 8:07:25 AM PDT by Teplukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

And I would suggest doing so, as "complaints" to the FTC are mere petitions for action; so the more they receive, the better.


17 posted on 08/11/2004 8:07:56 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

He's a law student. It's a learning experience.


18 posted on 08/11/2004 8:15:28 AM PDT by I still care (Have you heard about the Democrat cocktail? It's ketchup with a chaser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

LOL!


Good one.

I wonder if the NYT will run a story on this.


19 posted on 08/11/2004 8:15:51 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teplukin

That's my issue too. I hate having to read the NYT through a veil of skepticism, especially since my hometown newspaper is a subsidiary of the Times (Boston Globe). So, getting unbiased print news is hard in these parts.


20 posted on 08/11/2004 8:16:10 AM PDT by cwiz24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson