Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News Being Manipulated In Favor Of Bush
The Chattanoogan ^ | 8/10/04 | Mildred Perry Miller

Posted on 08/10/2004 4:56:47 PM PDT by Libloather

News Being Manipulated In Favor Of Bush
posted August 10, 2004

At the risk of finding myself quarentined at Guantanamo or Abu Graib, I would like to ask my conservative friends to take a few minutes to consider a few points involving their candidates for President and Vice-President. I do not write this casually. I believe these salient points deserve thoughtful and truthful thinking.

Following are some of the administrations actions that to me belie the American Constitution and the American former way of life. Also will be included failures of the media to engage in accurate and truthful reporting, without which our country cannot survive.

A "Christian Science Monitor" writer said that "America's 24 hour news channels are aiding the enemy by packaging fear to gain higher ratings, which encourages political criminals to contemplate further acts of political violence. Terrorists need less attention-not more. Pouring water on a grease fire only makes it worse." Amen!

For reasons I can't fathom, CNN, Fox News, and nearly all news outlets, with few exceptions, are manipulating the news in favor of George Bush. They do not talk of wars of aggression but put their own spin on everything, and they are not supported by the US Constitution. They are not telling the unvarnished truth but interpret events to suit themselves. In other words, they lie. They do not talk of wars of aggression and how they are not condoned by the US Constitution, the UN Charter, or principles set forth by national and international agreements. They talk as if they are describing the Revolutionary War. They do not refer to false statements made to lure the Congress and the American people into a needless and unjust war based on flawed intelligence about which the Administration was warned, but missed the signals, according to the 9/11 Commission.

The media gives thumbs up to an incompetent man who has shown contempt for laws that were put into effect to protect our own soldiers, as well as our opponents. Bush gets away with this because nobody thinks they are big enough to stop him, but we have an example in recent history of a President who was stopped when the Congress and his own party got enough of his criminal activity.

The media has reached the pits in news reporting. Those whom one has previously thought to have been credible have now lost it. CNN and Fox News show very little difference. It is all because of ratings. Why don't they cover Bush as completely as they do Kerry? Why do they seem to favor vicious tales not proven? In this week's Time Magazine, Joe Klein states that "the great partisan divide is 'possibly a media-induced mirage.'" If Klein is right, we all need to clear our vision and stop "seeing through a glass darkly." The war and the economy reporting should be given intense scrutiny for actual facts and not spurious flow of words by uninformed, would-be journalists. Klein calls them, and rightly so, "BLABOCRATS." As Shakespeare put it-"sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Why don't the two Blabocrat channels, CNN and Fox, say more about the exposing of the CIA agent? Why don't they talk more about the deficits and the unfunded programs such as "No Child Left Behind Act?" Why is Senator Shelby not excoriated the same as Sandy Berger? Why do they not say more about the 9/11 Commisson report and Bush's failure to heed its warnings. Why have we not heard more about the 18 Americans killed so far this week in Iraq? CNN reports as if it were Bush's campaign headquarters. And Rumsfeld keeps saying he thinks the rights of the Iraqis are worth deaths of American soldiers. It was not the Iraqis who bombed our towers.

Someone said that "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." We should not accept reporting from CNN or Fox News as the gospel. Nor should we completely put our faith in newspapers. Sooner or later, says Paul Krugman of The New York Times, there is going to be a reckoning" and Sheila Samples, an astute news analyst, states that "CNN, through laziness and sheer incompetence, is withholding the truth from people who have a right to know - the families of those incinerated on 9/11 and the families of everyone who died on Afghanistan and Iraqi battlefields." CNN's lack of objective reporting is harming us all but they feel secure because they don't think we care. To CNN and other unfair and unbalanced news organizations, it is high time for repentance, a change of heart, and an attempt to get at the truth, which, after all is the only thing that will keep us free.

I am sure there will be those who disagree with this, but please don't let me know about it. I am very busy with positive activities and will not have time to read or respond.

Mildred Perry Miller
Millermaj@aol.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: being; bush; delusionunparalleled; drivingmissdaisy; favor; idiot; manipulated; mediabias; news
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Libloather
News Being Manipulated In Favor Of Bush


61 posted on 08/10/2004 5:54:54 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The newspapers in Chattanooga are very liberal and are always slamming Bush. I stopped reading them a long time ago. The good side is that they do not represent the majority in TN.


62 posted on 08/10/2004 5:56:38 PM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What news is this person watching, reading, or listening to? I've seen very little pro-Bush news.


63 posted on 08/10/2004 5:58:51 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I am sure there will be those who disagree with this, but please don't let me know about it. I am very busy with positive activities and will not have time to read or respond. ---Mildred Perry Miller

From the fantasies in her article, I'd have to guess now it's PC to call experimenting with controlled substances "positive activities".

64 posted on 08/10/2004 6:01:45 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No barf alert?


65 posted on 08/10/2004 6:03:11 PM PDT by Desdemona (Labrador Retrievers - people dogs for dog people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN
The newspapers in Chattanooga are very liberal and are always slamming Bush. I stopped reading them a long time ago. The good side is that they do not represent the majority in TN. The "Chattanoogan" isn't the primary newspaper in Chattanooga - I'm not even sure if its a printed paper or just an internet blog of sorts. Either way, I think I'll write up a little editorial of my own.

Anyway, The Chattanooga Times-Free Press is the "normal" paper, and while it is left of center, at least it brings us John Leo, Walter Whitman, and Thomas Sowell in addition to those blathering leftists like Krugman and Dowd. The editorial pages are actually divided into left and right.

66 posted on 08/10/2004 6:09:35 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty

Yeah .. LOL! I loved that, and then she says, "I won't have time to read or respond".

That's the same thing as throwing a lit bomb in the window and then running away .. so typical of liberals.


67 posted on 08/10/2004 6:24:19 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: The only way to Peace is through Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I thought all of the stupid liberals were in California.


68 posted on 08/10/2004 6:29:37 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and Weather are our only news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mildred Perry Miller needs to stop taking those Timothy Leary sugar cubes. Sheesh!
69 posted on 08/10/2004 6:45:59 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

"Sooner or later, says Paul Krugman of The New York Times..."
Lady, as soon as you start quoting Paul Krugman, that is when you lose me. Truth/Krugman....an oxymoron. Krugman is the "moron" part.


70 posted on 08/10/2004 6:47:53 PM PDT by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty

"Ah, the liberal definition of dialogue."

ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!


71 posted on 08/10/2004 6:48:21 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Funny article.

Usually when I start a disjointed rant, starting sentences with phrases like "Somebody once said" my wife tactfully says "That is your last beer, right? Its getting late."


72 posted on 08/10/2004 6:53:11 PM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

CNN is lying to help Bush???? This woman is insane. In other words, a typical hard-core liberal.


73 posted on 08/10/2004 7:00:28 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
The author need not worry. I wouldn't waste my time with a personal E-Mail to him. Which makes me wonder why the author would ask for no replies and then post the email address at the end. It would be fitting if this person found 3 million replies in the in box tomorrow.
74 posted on 08/10/2004 7:10:28 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"BLABOCRATS." As Shakespeare put it-"sound and fury, signifying nothing."

This is the only thing in this article worth bothering with .I think you MAM are a typical liberal BLABOCRAT!

75 posted on 08/10/2004 7:50:23 PM PDT by suzyq5558 (Sayyyyyy....isnt disingenuous dissembler just a fancy way of saying your a LIAR???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Is the writer, like, a dumb college student?


76 posted on 08/10/2004 7:56:23 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

"I am busy with positive activites."
Translation: I am "giving back" to the community.

Why do libs always put it like that? Doesn't anyone do "community service" any more?


77 posted on 08/10/2004 7:59:06 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
For a liberal, Mildred makes a good social conservative, too.

No More Foot Rubs

Thanks for the sample copy of NYPress. Your paper is worse than I thought. I sent you an e-mail recently complaining about one word. Now I see nearly every other word in your publication is vulgar. I’m sorry that you lack the intelligence to express yourselves without resorting to such obscenities. Do you really have a following for such trash?

You will receive no further contact from me.

Mildred Perry Miller, Chattanooga, TN

78 posted on 08/10/2004 8:59:23 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mildred is old enough to have college graduate kids.  She is a piece of work.

I do not need anyone at Vanderbilt, such as Mr. Rentz, to lecture me on American history. The quotes he gave do not answer my concerns about the title of the Memorial Building. Had I known Vanderbilt people were so narrow-minded, I would not have paid 8 years for two of my children to attend there.

The situation makes me sad. America and Tennesseeans are better than what the student body is backing. This is my last word on the matter.
Mildred P. Miller

79 posted on 08/10/2004 9:05:10 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mildred Perry Miller

Who in the world is this woman!?!?!?!?! Why should we care what this ignoramous has to think?!?!?!?

80 posted on 08/10/2004 9:07:03 PM PDT by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson