Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/10/2004 12:25:41 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/10/2004 12:27:16 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I am certain there is a Federal program that net **subsidizes** folks who claim to have asthma.

Why?

Out of the blue, during the 90s, posters/ads went up all over NYC mass transit encouraging people (all the photos were of blacks) to be tested for the ailment.

The agitprop has been consistent, and clearly well-funded.

OBVIOUSLY sick folks should be certain to attend to their ailments, but the specific targeting of the disease and the cohort is highly suspicious.

4 posted on 08/10/2004 12:34:37 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Further, if you look at the regulation Bush wanted changed, you will find that the change would improve air quality and had as a core requirement that pollution levels would not increase. As I understood it, previous regs required a power plant to upgrade all of their equipment if making any modifications at all. The result, plants would make no efficency improvements at all because the cost would mean a tremendous investment. By that time, any plant that could justify the cost had made the improvements. Result, stalement. Under the proposed regs, a plant could install new equipment thereby increasing efficiency while improving air quality. They could only do so if the change did not increase their pollution output.* Therefore, to follow Kennedy's charges, it was the DemocRATs that encouraged the existing pollution levels to remain the same; Bush tried to improve things!

*To be fair, I guess you could say that efficiency improvements might happen that did not improve the pollution index BUT would reduce fuel consumption thereby meeting another national goal and also, by definition, would reduce CO2 emissions thereby being Kyoto-friendlyTM

6 posted on 08/10/2004 12:37:12 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
One thing forgotten about asthma. I'll have to say this very loud over the leftist media.

ASTHMA IS INHERITED

There. I have it. Several aunts uncles and cousins have it. My grandma had it. We all lived in different areas.

It's genetic.

7 posted on 08/10/2004 12:38:25 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("When the chips were down, you could not count on John Kerry." - Swift Boat Veterans for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Did you hear about increased incidence of asthma among children who as infants and toddlers were given multivitamins?


8 posted on 08/10/2004 12:40:06 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The vast increase in asthma in all sectors of the US population is probably attributable to the aggressive control of childhood lung infections, the overly tightly sealed homes most people now live in and the overall reduction in the amount of true nuturing children get early on since most Moms now work.


13 posted on 08/10/2004 1:57:14 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If you listen to Kerry's speech he says "children in Harlem suffer frorm HAIR pollution." I guess he was referring to Al Sharpton's uncontrollable urge to use Aqua Net on his 'do.


15 posted on 08/10/2004 2:34:01 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The genetic predisposition to develop restrictive airways disease can be inherited. During the 1950s and 1960s new medications permitted the survival of severely ill asthma patients who wouldn't otherwise have lived to reproductive age. Then those asthmatics had kids, and their kids had kids, and we are now in the third and fourth generation in some cases. Thus, the tendency to acquire asthma upon exposure to allergic insult is disseminated through the population. Unfortunately, some of these kids get seriously ill, especially when they come into contact with the cigarette smoke and cockroach refuse that are endemic in the worst parts of the inner city, and sometimes their cases aren't followed as closely as they should be. And so we have black children dying in growing numbers.

Before anybody asks what the basis is for makign statements like this: my views were developed in conversation with the clinical researchers at the National Jewish Hospital and Research Center, the nation's foremost center for investigation of respiratory and immune disordes.

20 posted on 08/10/2004 4:10:31 PM PDT by Capriole (DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson