To: Protagoras
The party is irrelevant. Always has been. The point is, when you push your bad apples off onto another group, you expose yourself to the same nonsense.
But I couldn't disagree more. A party is as relative as its platform. I'm not even sure I know exactly what you meant there, so I should probably wait for clarification before ranting.
One man's bad apple is another man's pie filling. You're accusing Republicans of trying to push a "bad apple" out...what makes him a bad apple to Republicans? (Well, aside from the child porn charges that were later dropped - but we've barely been talking about those.)
Would he be considered a bad apple to Libertarians? To libertarians?
118 posted on
08/10/2004 11:37:13 AM PDT by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong.)
To: beezdotcom
Every party has it's rotten apples.
Parties exist to elect people.
Philosophies describe ideas.
If you disagree with someone's ideas, debate the ideas.
If you would like to ask a question about a philosophy, fire away. But try to avoid personal attacks, it didn't work too well for the other poster. I assume you are an honest poster so you can take that as a general comment not aimed at you specifically.
119 posted on
08/10/2004 11:51:57 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson