"I would still be picking cotton if the country's moral principles had not been shaped by the Declaration of Independence," Keyes said. He said Obama "has broken and rejected those principles-- he has taken the slaveholder's position." Damn! He's stirred up the hornet's nest with that! I love it!
1 posted on
08/09/2004 6:31:20 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: wagglebee
The democrat party was, AND REMAINS FOR THE LAST 150 YEARS, the party of suppression and degradation of African Americans.
The Republican Party was founded for the specific purpose of liberating blacks, and fought a bloody civil war agaist the democrat party for that purpose.
87 posted on
08/09/2004 8:40:19 PM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: wagglebee
Excellent. Keyes has to expose Obama as the fool he is.
To: wagglebee
Only cotton either one of these guys has seen was in a new bottle of aspirn.
97 posted on
08/09/2004 10:26:37 PM PDT by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: wagglebee
"I would still be picking cotton if the country's moral principles had not been shaped by the Declaration of Independence," Keyes said. He said Obama "has broken and rejected those principles-- he has taken the slaveholder's position." That's a really stupid quote. After all, it took 89 years after the Dec of Independence to free the slaves.
To: wagglebee
Go, Keyes, go!!
Just ignore the liberal GOPers siding with the Dems. :-)
105 posted on
08/09/2004 11:41:07 PM PDT by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: wagglebee
Woo Hoo!!! This is gonna be good!
130 posted on
08/10/2004 7:56:58 AM PDT by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: wagglebee
Obama said Monday that there would be "a sufficient number of debates" between himself and Keyes-- both men are Harvard-educated, polished debaters-- but not the seven such clashes he had promised Ryan. "That was the home-state special," Obama cracked. He declined to set a specific number, adding that staffers in the two campaigns would iron on the details later.
Sounds to me that Obama is running scared on the debate issue already.....
131 posted on
08/10/2004 8:00:10 AM PDT by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: wagglebee
"I would still be picking cotton if the country's moral principles had not been shaped by the Declaration of Independence," Keyes said. He said Obama "has broken and rejected those principles-- he has taken the slaveholder's position." Holy bleep! Obama should just keep his mouth shut for the next three months.
Keyes is going to obliterate Obama with thunderous rhetoric.
137 posted on
08/10/2004 10:37:27 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: wagglebee
Nice rhetorical flourish. But what, exactly, is the difference between the men who set down those principles in the Declaration, and put their names to it, and slaveholders?
140 posted on
08/10/2004 10:47:26 AM PDT by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: wagglebee
Keyes is going to make this race interesteing. At least there will be some debate and thought on the issues.
To: wagglebee
I would have preferred Ditka. If Ditka attacked Obama, the media would consider it cute. With Keyes, the media will consider it hateful. Just wait until somebody calls Keyes "the house N*gger". You know somebody's gonna say it before November gets here.
152 posted on
08/10/2004 12:13:15 PM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(Let's REALLY Split The Country! (www.righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
To: wagglebee
Anybody else notice that in the notices in papers around the country yesterday about the GOP choice of Keyes in Illinois, Keyes was referred to as A Maryland CONSERVATIVE Republican.
On the other hand, Obama was NOT referred to as a LIBERAL. Instead, he was called a "rising star" in the Democratic Party.
How's that for not-so-subtle liberal slant of the news?
OReilly should latch on to that one!!! That is, if he still cares about the journalistic bias toward the Left and against any who dare hold for "conserving" and preserving the Founders' views.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson