Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Out To Sabotage Iran's Atom Bomb Programme
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 8-9-2004 | David Rennie

Posted on 08/08/2004 6:38:40 PM PDT by blam

US out to sabotage Iran's atom bomb programme

By David Rennie in Washington
(Filed: 09/08/2004)

The Bush administration is trying to find covert ways to sabotage or delay Iran's nuclear weapons programme believing that diplomatic deals struck with European nations have barely slowed Teheran's rush towards the bomb.

Intelligence and administration officials are urgently trying to find secret means "to disrupt or delay as long as we can" the development of an Iranian bomb, one said. The urgency stems, in part, from "increasingly strong private statements" by Israeli counterparts that they may be forced to take military action to stop Iran achieving its dream of a nuclear arsenal.

Iranian missiles could deliver a nuclear payload to Israel or US bases in the gulf

One American official told the New York Times that the Israelis were "doing what they can to delay the Iranian programme, and preparing military options".

It is uncertain that it is possible to stop Iran joining the nuclear club, thanks to the know-how Teheran bought from Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, the former Pakistani nuclear chief, US officials told the newspaper.

With his appearances now focused on the November elections, President George W Bush rarely mentions Iran and North Korea in public, although the two nations were founder members of his "axis of evil" with Iraq.

Mr Bush's Democratic challenger, Senator John Kerry, has sought to attack him for ignoring North Korea and Iran and concentrating on Iraq, whose nuclear programme has turned out to have been largely moribund.

Such Democratic charges have not gained much traction with ordinary voters. In Middle America the Iraq war is overwhelmingly viewed as a response to the September 11 attacks and part of a campaign to keep America safe from further terror attacks, rather than as a piece in a larger geopolitical puzzle.

Iran has announced in the past two weeks that it was resuming the construction of centrifuges needed to produce weapons grade uranium, dealing a seemingly fatal blow to a deal brokered by European nations last year, to limit Iran's nuclear research.

The national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, said US leadership had brought the world - including the United Nations watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Authority - round to seeing the menace of a nuclear-armed Iran.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: atom; bomb; irannukes; irans; missiles; out; programme; sabatage; us

1 posted on 08/08/2004 6:38:40 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

"It's a GOOD thing."
Martha Stewart


2 posted on 08/08/2004 6:40:17 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
In Middle America the Iraq war is overwhelmingly viewed as a response to the September 11 attacks and part of a campaign to keep America safe from further terror attacks, rather than as a piece in a larger geopolitical puzzle.

How are these mutually exclusive?

3 posted on 08/08/2004 6:41:46 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
US out to sabotage Iran's atom bomb programme

CUBS FAIL TO QUALIFY FOR WORLD SERIES!

OJ SIMPSON STILL HASN'T FOUND 'REAL KILLERS'!

RICHARD SIMMONS GAY!

Plus more fascinating articles, only in this month's issue of DUH: THE JOURNAL OF THE OBVIOUS!

4 posted on 08/08/2004 6:43:51 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Mullahs want a nuclear bomb?

Perhaps the US should give them one.

5 posted on 08/08/2004 7:13:52 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Nuclear capability in Iran would be disasterous for anything that would resemle "stability" in the middle east. However, Israel should not be doing any attacking of Iranian sites. The passive europeans need to step forward and do something(hahahah). Seriously though, Israel attacking these sites would potentially cause a full scale war in the ME.


6 posted on 08/08/2004 7:18:16 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Like it's a bad thing?


7 posted on 08/08/2004 7:20:48 PM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conshack

The Europeans have been trying (in their own stupid way) to get Iran to stop.

Sorry, but telling Iran "Under no circumstance will we attack you, but will you please please stop making nukes?" won't work.


8 posted on 08/08/2004 7:22:17 PM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conshack
"Seriously though, Israel attacking these sites would potentially cause a full scale war in the ME."

It's eventually gonna come to that...so, may as well do it now.

9 posted on 08/08/2004 7:45:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

I would like to see the "sabotage" take the form of 100 well placed MOAB's.


10 posted on 08/08/2004 7:59:19 PM PDT by samadams2000 ("Did they get you to trade, your heroes for ghosts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dodger

Slight editing --- change "give" to "deliver". :>)


11 posted on 08/08/2004 8:27:16 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaMoDee
Roger & out.
12 posted on 08/10/2004 4:38:43 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
may as well do it now

Iran may be waiting until they actually have a couple of nukes rather than going off early like Saddam. The problem is that Iran, N Kor, and China all have immediate objectives and may act at the same time. As you say, though, it is just a matter of time and it will be worse the longer it waits.

13 posted on 08/10/2004 4:46:34 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson