Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice Says World Is Determined to Prevent a Nuclear-Armed Iran
The New York Times ^ | August 8, 2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 08/08/2004 1:20:34 PM PDT by SoloGlobalExplorer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- With Iran stepping up its nuclear program, a top White House aide said Sunday the world finally is ``worried and suspicious'' over the Iranians' intentions and is determined not to let Tehran produce a nuclear weapon.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice also said the Bush administration sees a new international willingness to act against Iran's nuclear program. She credited the changed attitude to the Americans' insistence that Iran's effort put the world in peril.

She would not say whether the United States would act alone to end the program if the administration could not win international support.

Iran's foreign minister, Kamal Kharrazi, announced a week ago that his country had resumed building nuclear centrifuges. He said Iran was retaliating for the West's failure to force the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency to close its file on possible Iranian violations of nuclear nonproliferation rules.

Kharrazi said Iran was not resuming enrichment of uranium, which requires a centrifuge. But, he said, Iran had restarted manufacturing the device because Britain, Germany and France had not stopped the investigation by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

``The United States was the first to say that Iran was a threat in this way, to try and convince the international community that Iran was trying, under the cover of a civilian nuclear program, to actually bring about a nuclear weapons program,'' Rice said on CNN's ``Late Edition.''

``I think we've finally now got the world community to a place, and the International Atomic Energy Agency to a place, that it is worried and suspicious of the Iranian activities,'' she said. ``Iran is facing for the first time real resistance to trying to take these steps.''

Bush, in his 2003 State of the Union address, included Iran with North Korea and Iraq in an ``axis of evil'' dedicated to developing nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction.

Since then, North Korea has publicly resumed its nuclear development program. In Iraq, invading U.S.-led forces have found no such programs after President Saddam Hussein was deposed.

Iran announced in June that it would resume its centrifuge program. Afterward, the U.S. official whose job is to slow the global atomic arms race, Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton, told Congress that Iran was jabbing ``a thumb in the eye of the international community.''

On NBC's ``Meet the Press,'' Rice reasserted that the world has fallen in line on Iran and said she expects next month to get a very strong statement from the IAEA ``that Iran will either be isolated, or it will submit to the will of the international community.''

She also said, ``We cannot allow the Iranians to develop a nuclear weapon. The international community has got to find a way to come together and to make certain that that does not happen.''


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrine; condoleezzarice; iran; irannukes; preemption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Glad to see the U.S. is acknowledging that action against Iran will be needed.
1 posted on 08/08/2004 1:20:34 PM PDT by SoloGlobalExplorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer

Thank God we have Rice and the rest of current administration running American foerign policy.


2 posted on 08/08/2004 1:23:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A republic, if we can revive it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer

What's cookin'.... ?


3 posted on 08/08/2004 1:24:00 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer

Was Israel informed in advance... ?


4 posted on 08/08/2004 1:24:57 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer
I'd love to ask the following question to Sen. Kerry at one of the debates:

As president, would you be willing to let Iran obtain an atom bomb before you took measures to disarm them or would you preempt their ability to acquire the technplogy before that happened?

5 posted on 08/08/2004 1:25:31 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
The Iranians have until Nov 3 to build a bomb - they know it would be VERY difficult politically for Bush to move against them and its highly unlikely for the UN to do anything - but if Bush gets reelected...

Rice better start escalating the pre-war of words if the intel shows them close to a bomb...

6 posted on 08/08/2004 1:31:28 PM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: corkoman

Don't worry about it. Israel will take care of it if necessary.


8 posted on 08/08/2004 1:36:49 PM PDT by ChinaThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer
"I think we've finally now got the world community to a place, and the International Atomic Energy Agency to a place, that it is worried and suspicious of the Iranian activities,'' she said"

Fantastic! After “worried and suspicious” comes “angry and determined”. A few years of that and the world community will be “convinced and resolved”. Resolutions will be passed! Inspectors will be dispatched at Iran’s convenience. The world community will be “frustrated and impatient”.

Then comes the question, is Bush or Kerry the CIC of the ONLY military capable of denting that of Iran?

If Bush, then the world community will be, “divided and embittered ” over our aggression to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. If Kerry, then the world community will be “resigned and concerned” over the next new member of the nuclear club.

Who says this election doesn’t matter.

9 posted on 08/08/2004 1:39:40 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epr64

We don't need to occupy Iran. A proxy war might work here. Spec Ops assisting internal armed resistance to the government may be enough to set off a popular revolution. If a popular revolution begins we could assist the rebels with air assets in necessary situations as well as providing a supply route through either Iraq or Afghanastan. We own the airspace around Iran. We own the dirt around Iran. We can do alot to alter the state of things in this country. We should be fostering agents in Iraq for infiltration into Iran. We should also be doing this in Afghanastan and developing ties with proxy groups who can do our bidding. There is no way the Mullahs could keep us from supplying and assisting insurgents inside the borders of Iran. We have the kurds in the north to boot.

I agree with your point. An occupation of Iran would be bloody and make Iraq look like a cakewalk. It would undermine the existing disaffections of many Iranian people and turn them on the west. I think as long as the adults are still in charge, they will be cognizant of the reality of an invasion of Iran and look for more ingenous ways of dealing with this. Worst case scenario, Israel will physically destroy their nuclear capability. Iran will not have a nuclear plan. I'm sure of this unless they already have the capability.

North Korea is a much more difficult nut to crack.


10 posted on 08/08/2004 1:48:11 PM PDT by ChinaThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: epr64
Hmmm. Would you volunteer for it? Won't be Iraq, as bad as it is for the moment. Will be a LOT harsher.

Yep, troll, I sure would volunteer for it, just as I voluntarily served from '69 to '72. What, other than panty-waist DU, have you ever volunteered for?

Now move along, son, this is no place for children.

11 posted on 08/08/2004 1:48:50 PM PDT by HorsePlayer (Give me a $100 trifecta on Bush-Kerry-Nader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer

This issue needs to be raised so Kerry has to take a position on it.


12 posted on 08/08/2004 1:53:09 PM PDT by votelife (Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
If Kerry, then the world community will be “resigned and concerned” over the next new member of the nuclear club....

Yep.

Kerry will do for Iran what Clinton/Carter did for N. Korea.....help them into the nuclear club.

Depend on it.

13 posted on 08/08/2004 1:55:20 PM PDT by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: votelife
Kerry says we have to have a more sensitive war on terror.

We have to be sensitive to the feelings of the Iranians. After all they are humans.

14 posted on 08/08/2004 2:18:21 PM PDT by n.y.muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer
Welcome to freerepublic.

FMCDH(BITS)

15 posted on 08/08/2004 2:20:07 PM PDT by nothingnew (KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Q. As president, would you be willing to let Iran obtain an atom bomb before you took measures to disarm them or would you preempt their ability to acquire the technplogy before that happened?


Kerry. "As President I would rebuild our alliances and re-establish our respect in the world community so that we could work with other countries in the world to apply the kind of pressure on Iran that would presuade them to abandon their nuclear weapons program. One thing I learned in Vietnam is that war should be our last choice, not our first choice."


16 posted on 08/08/2004 2:36:30 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer

Rice 2008.


17 posted on 08/08/2004 2:42:08 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat

How about we call it "Iraqiranafghanastan" after all of the radical islamofacists are removed?


18 posted on 08/08/2004 3:00:38 PM PDT by vger (asta la vista earthlinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer
This article has been posted to DoctorZin’s New News Blog!


19 posted on 08/08/2004 3:14:30 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoloGlobalExplorer
She would not say whether the United States would act alone to end the program if the administration could not win international support.

THERE'S NO NEED TO FEAR....UNDERDOG (IAF) IS HERE!

20 posted on 08/08/2004 3:17:23 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson