Too many girlie men, and manly girls in California. The place is a wreck.
"I was tortured to write letters to John Kerry and others at the time," said former U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Ed Martin of San Diego, who was a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for six years. "Our tormentors used him against us."
If true, Bush can't win California. He will need every Republican to vote for him, and either a bajillion Rats to stay home or cast a crossover vote.
The Republican party has the most registered Republicans in one state in our entire nation, and yet they can't come up with any leaders who people could want to follow.
That is the problem with why things don't progress toward the right in California and until the leadership finds some talent out there and has the guts to step aside and let them lead, we will go NOWHERE!
We have to be better than Democrats because they want to give away the state treasury and conservatives want to move away from that, which is not as popular as getting free stuff.
Viva La Resistance... May California Be Free!!!
Analyzing John Kerry we know that he may, or may not, had been a war hero in Viet Nam. He claims to be BUT will not release his military records and medical records to confirm that claim.
We also know that Kerry vehemently protested the Viet Nam war, along side Jane Fonda, after his return to the US by being a leader of the Viet Nam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). And we know that Kerry's VVAW voted to assassinate United States congressmen who were sympathetic to the Viet Nam war!
We know that John Kerry's performance as a United States Senator from Massachusetts was on the very far left of the political spectrum making him more liberal than Ted Kennedy. We also know from that senatorial performance that he offered very little as far as bills are concerned that would better this country.
We know that John Kerry has taken both sides of nearly every issue ultimately voting along liberal democrat party lines on each issue.
We know that John Heinz Kerry's run for the presidency would have died last November if it were not for his rich wife's 6.7 million dollar loan to him.
We know that John Kerry is an opportunist who would do almost anything to promote his own image. (Made home videos of the location of his killing an unarmed, wounded, fleeing Viet Cong enemy soldier, obviously to record his greatness for posterity).
Then we have GW Bush, who as the writer states may not be the sharpest stick in the pack, who has prevented another 9/11 for nearly three years.
Who has taken the terrorist game to the terrorist cave and not in Peoria, Illinois.
Who has improved on an economy that was handed to him. (I know, some will say BUT unemployment is still high? But for eight years of the Clinton administration I heard Robert Rubin, who some acclaim as an economy saint, say that jobs are a lagging indicator. Lagging sometimes by 6 months to a year after a slowdown.)
We know that GW Bush is basically an honest and decent guy (as much as a politician can be) and has strong convictions about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all in this country.
And we know that Mrs GW Bush is a hell of a lot more appealing to the American public than Mrs John Kerry (if that's what she is calling herself these days.)
Since he wrote it off in 2000, the headline should read, "Republicans optimistic by 50% for Bush's prospects in California"
"California and it's 55 electoral votes..."
Can this paper not afford editors??
There are more Democrats than Republicans in California's electorate and they won't go for a Texan. That's just a Golden State fact of political life. Kerry will win here in a walk and Californians will re-elect ultra-liberal Democratic U.S Senate Babs Boxer.
As long as the people of California think the main question is, how can the government better serve their needs, the problem will not be fixed.
The real problem with CA is that illegals vote, you don't need an ID to vote here. I have a feeling if voter fraud were taken out of the equation the RATS wouldn't even be a liable party anymore.