Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rose in RoseBear; All

Gutsy how he came out swinging on this issue AFTER his daughter graduated.

What a load. Legacies are MORE legitimate than affirmative action. At least legacies have a family history and connection with the institution. It's no more wrong to give a family with a connection to the school preference than it is to give frequent flyers free upgrades.

I'm pissed at Bush for all sorts of things, and I'll probably still vote for him, but on this, he's a complete hypocrite, and selling out to the left AGAIN. I have no way of benefitting from a legacy situation, but if Adnan Kashoggi wants to donate millions to American University and his kids get in, or the Woodruff family wants to build a stadium at Duke and their kids get in, it's only right that the school show some loyalty in return. Bush says that the only loyalty institutions should have is to diversity. Let's all worship on that worthless high altar.

One more check against the not-as-bad-as-the-Rats party.


3 posted on 08/07/2004 2:42:52 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
I'm pissed at Bush for all sorts of things, and I'll probably still vote for him, but on this, he's a complete hypocrite, and selling out to the left AGAIN.

You, like far too many, don't understand the meaning of 'hypocrite'. For example, a recent anti-drug commercial has a dad talking about how he used to use drugs as a teen and how he's a hypocrite for telling his teen now not to use drugs. The ad concludes with a voice-over saying something to the effect that it's better to be a hypocrite than to have the kid on drugs. This is an incorrect use of the word. Now, if the dad were currently doing that which he was telling someone else not to do, then he would be a hypocrite.

By the way, I don't think that the practice of legacy admissions is an "academic crony scam." There are a lot of things to be gained by various types of admission. Affirmative action may enable the school to bring in students that don't match basic entry criteria but who, through interviews, are considered to be worthy to enter. It is good for both the students and the school when such students graduate--and these students who were given a chance at something great are more likely than others to remember the school when it comes time for alumni support. Legacy admissions play another important role, especially in private schools. Most of the endowments of the private schools come from alumni contributions. These schools couldn't exist without those endowments and the endowments couldn't exist without the contributions. If legacy admissions perform the function of keeping people connected with the school to facilitate the support of the school over the long haul, they are worth it. Spots for faculty children, though, aren't the same as legacy admissions because they are part of the faculty employment package.
6 posted on 08/07/2004 6:14:04 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile
At least legacies have a family history and connection with the institution.

Also -- like a strong football team -- a good source of donations.

26 posted on 08/08/2004 3:46:27 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson