Skip to comments.
Clinton accuses Bush of contracting out US security to Pakistan
AFP ^
| 8/7
Posted on 08/07/2004 12:05:29 AM PDT by ambrose
TORONTO (AFP) - Former US Pre-sident Bill Clin-ton on Thursday accused President George W. Bushs administration of contracting out US security and the hunt for Osama bin Laden to Pakistan, in its zeal to wage war in Iraq.
Though he didnt mention Bush by name, Clinton, on a book tour in Canada, said the Iraq war had drained resources which could have been better spent chasing the suspected mastermind of the September 11 attacks. We will never know if we could have gotten him (bin Laden), because we didnt make it a priority, Clinton said in an interview with CBC television.
Clinton, who is supporting Bushs Democratic opponent Senator John Kerry in the November 2 US election, said that at the time of the Iraq war, Saddam Hussein was only Washingtons number five security threat.
Why did we put our number one security threat in the hands of the Pakistanis with us playing the supporting role and put all our military resources into Iraq which was I think at best our number five security threat? asked Clinton.
How did we get to the point where we have 130,000 troops in Iraq and 15,000 in Afghanistan? Clinton said other top security threats after the September 11, 2001 attacks on which the Bush administration should have concentrated were the Middle East, the India-Pakistan conflict, and North Koreas nuclear program.
Clinton also said that, had he been President during the run-up to the Iraq war and former United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix told him Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, he would have sided with Blix in the face of US intelligence data to the contrary.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: execrableslime; pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
08/07/2004 12:05:30 AM PDT
by
ambrose
To: doug from upland
this might get one or two replies.
2
posted on
08/07/2004 12:05:58 AM PDT
by
ambrose
(Kerry is endorsed by the Communist Party USA)
To: ambrose
We will never know if we could have gotten him (bin Laden), because we didnt make it a priority, Clinton said in an interview with CBC television.
I think he was talking about the dozen or so chances his administration had to get Ossama.
3
posted on
08/07/2004 12:07:15 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(geocities.com/geronl is back, or will be)
To: ambrose
We will never know if we could have gotten him (bin Laden), because we didnt make it a priority, Clinton said in an interview with CBC television.
He's right. HIS administration did not make it a priority.
4
posted on
08/07/2004 12:08:23 AM PDT
by
Tom_Busch
(Vote Bush/Cheney in 2004)
To: GeronL
You beat me to the punch. :-)
5
posted on
08/07/2004 12:08:56 AM PDT
by
Tom_Busch
(Vote Bush/Cheney in 2004)
To: ambrose
Speaking of clinton, whatever happened to the Sandy Burglar story?
6
posted on
08/07/2004 12:09:02 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Do Chernobyl restaurants serve Curied chicken?)
To: Jeff Chandler
What are you talking about? The media has much better things to do, like cover Abu Graihb and the President's six minutes with the school children on 9/11. So the guy was stealing/altering top-secret documents. Everybody knows he's just sloppy.
7
posted on
08/07/2004 12:13:25 AM PDT
by
Tom_Busch
(Vote Bush/Cheney in 2004)
He used "we" as in the royal "we" as in "I". So technically, he was telling the truth for once!
Slicker 'n ever...
To: ambrose
Why didn't you do anything for eight years you scummy bastard?!?
9
posted on
08/07/2004 12:16:18 AM PDT
by
beaversmom
(Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
To: ambrose
Bill Clin-ton on Thursday accused President George W. Bushs administration of contracting out US security At least Bush is doing smth about it unlike the syphlitic, cocaine snorting rapist that was in office from 1993-2001
10
posted on
08/07/2004 12:20:51 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Many a law, many a commandment have I broken, but my word never.)
To: ambrose
Though he didnt mention Bush by name, Clinton, on a book tour in Canada, said the Iraq war had drained resources which could have been better spent chasing the suspected mastermind of the September 11 attacks. We will never know if we could have gotten him (bin Laden), because we didnt make it a priority
Well, we do know that CLINTON didn't capture Bin Laden because CLINTON didn't make it a priority. When Richard Clarke said kill him, Sandy Berger said no. And Clinton was too busy with his indiscretions in the Oval Office to care.
By the way, why do these libs always have to leave the country to make these allegations. Do they think the American people are too stupid to find out what they said by doing searches on the Internet?
To: ambrose
Okay, two points:
1) The failure of this idio...., um former President, to honor the tradition of silence regarding his successor is one of the reasons the country is so divided. He just can't stand to be sidelined (even though his time IS over) and not have his name in the headlines. So much so that he would do harm to the nation in the process.
2) What is this obsession with one man - Bin Laden, this is a WAR on Terror, not no Bin Laden! If he had been captured on 9/12 we would still be at war! This is not a LAW ENFORCEMENT type MAN HUNT!
Of course the President has counter this point over the past 3 years, but is our memory really that short?
DKK
12
posted on
08/07/2004 12:31:29 AM PDT
by
LifeTrek
To: ambrose
Someone please tell me again why President Bush was nice to Xlinton during his portrait unveiling.
15,000 troops in Afghanistan is 15,000 more than Clinton ever had there.
14
posted on
08/07/2004 12:32:54 AM PDT
by
oolatec
To: ambrose
Sounds fair to me.
Didn't Old Slick
contract out our security to the Red Chinese when he was in office?
15
posted on
08/07/2004 12:35:18 AM PDT
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Methinks Bubba doth protest too much. He's trying to cover for the fact that he let Sandy Hamburgler talk him into not doing anything about Bin Laden. He is nothing more than a sleazy opportunist trying to protect a nonexistent legacy.
16
posted on
08/07/2004 12:40:48 AM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(I'll put Bush's four years in office against Kerry's four months in Vietnam any time! Bring it on!)
To: ambrose
If Osama is in Pakistan, and the Pakistani gov't won't allow American troops to conduct offensive operations in its territory, and the Pakistani gov't is willing to hunt for bin Laden on its own... then what the heck is wrong with the status quo? Should we start a war with Pakistan?
17
posted on
08/07/2004 12:45:56 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: GeronL
Or the fact that Bubba ordered to capture, rather than kill him. Ya know, it was a law enforcement issue...
18
posted on
08/07/2004 12:55:48 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
To: ambrose
sorry for being blunt... but doesn't he have a whore or two that needs his attention?
why is he trying to screw us, when he has so many hotties to bag?
clinton will do hard time in his lifetime.
he just can't let it go.
it can be a mistake
to hang on
when the
time's
run
out
.
19
posted on
08/07/2004 12:59:40 AM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: xm177e2
Re: Should we start a war with Pakistan?
Always wondered if they wouldn't let us in back in '01. Heck right now they're putting down a quite Islamic insurrection akin to Saudi Arabia. Support the regime...for now. Machiavelli strategy.
20
posted on
08/07/2004 12:59:54 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson