Posted on 08/06/2004 2:56:30 PM PDT by rdb3
 |
||||
 NEWS
|
||||
|
||||
SAN FRANCISCO -- In his keynote address on Wednesday at LinuxWorld, IBM Senior Vice President of Technology and Marketing Nick Donofrio assured the Linux nation his company would not assert its formidable patent portfolio against the Linux kernel and strongly advocated others to promise the same. |
Donofrio's remarks were in response to a statement earlier this week from the Open Source Risk Management organization based on its research and initial analysis of patents that might affect the Linux kernel. A number of those patents were identified as being owned by several larger companies with strategic Linux-based strategies including IBM.
"I can say that as an ally that believes in the positive power that the Linux community is having on collaborative innovation, I can assure you we have no intention of asserting our patents against the Linux kernel, unless, of course, we are forced to defend ourselves," Donofrio said.
Donofrio threw out a challenge to the IT community to join together to establish procedures that avoid infringement claims and to also try to resolve them as they come up.
"When more people have access to the building blocks of innovation, it can inject a richer perspective to the creative process. When you combine all the diversity of the world in the open environments, it's a rather humbling thought," Donofrio said.
Donofrio said collaborative innovation figures to play a significant role in the future of IT and that Linux, various grid technologies, and the Internet will continue to be an influence there. He contended that countries around the world will have to find the right balance between collaborative innovation along with the respect for intellectual property as it applies to IT.
"For IBM's part, we pledge to do everything in our power to help stroke that balance. I can promise you that," Donofrio said.
The open movement, which Donofrio sees happening in many industries outside of computer software, is forcing people to rethink their various intellectual property models and to rethink where it is they can offer the most value to their respective users.
He contends this overall open movement has encouraged and enabled competition to continue thriving. Donofrio then made an open plea to governments and private businesses to "collectively sharpen" their focus on policies and practices that would serve to encourage and to support innovation.
"Why does innovation matter? Well, consider one issue that has been at the center of discussion for some time: job growth," Donofrio said.
He cited a recent economic study that stated some 91 million new jobs would be created in the coming years, but that it is yet to be determined in which countries most of those jobs would be based.
"It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that many of the best jobs will go to those countries that create the most fertile environments for innovation," Donofrio said.
Donofrio then started preaching to the Linux choice saying that Linux and the open source community in general holds the potential to spark remarkable innovation because the technology is at once owned by no one but yet by everyone. It is this concept that will give it a major advantage compared with those still espousing proprietary platforms.
"The forces that cling to closed ways of doing things are doing nothing to advance innovation. When you box people in and create these artificial barriers to solving problems, you can't have [innovative] solutions spring forward," Donofrio said.
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Scannell is an editor at large at InfoWorld. |
But that's the great thing about Linux: it'll run practically anywhere. You have a choice of hardware, software and support vendors. I have a mix of HP, IBM, Gateway, Dell, Toshiba and Microtel here, everything runs Red Hat, and I can support myself.
As an aside, have you noticed that FR's spell checker does not recognize linux :D but has no problem with Microsoft?
I don't use spell-checkers. I don't need 'em. ;-)
Aha... well, FR does run on Linux after all.
IBM doesn't want to get in the hogpen of Linux business, and is using Red Hat and Novell to keep it's hands clean. The last thing they want is to have to pay a $500 million dollar fine to Eolas for a browser patent like Microsoft did. They will continue to use Red Hat and others as a proxy for selling their hardware, which leaves Red Hat and Novell exposed to these suits. Once a few start kicking in (those owning the patents are in no hurry now, simply waiting for higher Linux installed base numbers), it will force the Linux sofware companies to start charging more for their wares to keep out of the red.
Where IBM will first begin to threaten patent issues will be with other open source applications that compete with DB2 or WebSphere. We've already seen the threat open source databases pose to them, as well as IBM's willingness to sue other database vendors for patent infringement.
Well, That's an interesting opinion but IBM does make very reliable hardware and operating systems. True that what they produce such as OS/400 is proprietary but it is much more stable than open systems. And that is simply a statistical fact.
You can call it cheerleading but for every IBM bigot there are 10 times as many open systems bigots. And for the record there are things about both concepts which are useful. I would never exclude one and embrace the other.
Technology is like a salad bar, you take what you want and leave what you dont.
Cute. Good name I guess, as Groklaw is usually writing about SCO, a company trying to make a joke of the law.
It's two different things. Musicians are covered under copyright, while these engineers and inventors are covered under patent. But in both cases they receive royalties for their creations/inventions being played/sold.
I guess engineers should get themselves agents and producers.
F small business, long link monopolies..
I had IBM in here the other day pushing hard for a p series box running Linux (Because Oracle supports Linux)..
The primary purpose of my employer is to develop new software applications, which we do and so far no one has sued us for patent or copyright infringement. If we are violating other's IP, and we begin to grow in market share, they may let us know, at which point we would be obligated to legally settle the dispute.
No different than if you opened up a hamburger place right next to "McDonalds" and put up a goldem M but called it "McBurgers". According to you though, if McDonald's complained, they would be trying to "F small business" I guess.
Simple, to break the SUN/SCO dominance of the *nix market, which they've now done by devaluing Unix IP to equate with freeware.
Problem is most engineers do their work for hire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
