Why do his motives ALWAYS have to be suspect?
John Kerry and War Crimes in Vietnam
(He was in command of a Swift Boat
and ordered his men to do these things.
Listen to this 1971 audio clip)
http://www.streamload.com/jmstein77/Kerry2.mp3
Now Sabertooth shows up here claiming Corsi was derelict in his due diligence and is responsible for the hit on the Swifties because *gasp* there are conservatives in their midst, one of whom happens to be a member of the FRN!
I find his argument unpersuasive and self serving.
Next, on another thread Sabertooth makes this comment..."This will be a huge blow to their credibility, unfortunately, but to be fair, it wasn't the responsibility of the Swift Vets to triplecheck every allegation. That task belonged to the authors of "Unfit for Command," one of whom, Jerry Corsi, is a Freeper."
There are two issues here. One, Sabertooth is not being truthful. Corsi's comments about sKerrys medals is based on the comments of dozens of other Swifties, not just the commander who backed off on his signed affidavit somewhat today. The fact is he signed the thing and that is what Corsi knew to be a fact. That he has now retracted some is not Corsi's fault and Corsi did his due diligence, but Sabertooth would like you to think he was derelict in some way.
The next issue is that Sabertooth mentions Corsi is a FReeper (he doesn't post under his real name). In a later post, he mentions that he checked DU and they are talking about this, we can assume it may now show up in the media. Why is Sabertooth feeding DU, and by extension the media that is trying to smear the Swifties, information like this?
First he complains that the Swifties left themselves open to lefty attack by associating with know conservatives *gasp* and then proceeds to offer them more grist for their smear machine?
Ya, I think something smells here.