Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neets
They're only suspect when they warrant suspicion. Sabertooth was sympathetic to Hon (now banned) who claimed to be working with Lipscomb, a somewhat competitor to Corsi and the Swifties. Hon has been relentless in his criticism of Corsi on antifreeper boards.

Now Sabertooth shows up here claiming Corsi was derelict in his due diligence and is responsible for the hit on the Swifties because *gasp* there are conservatives in their midst, one of whom happens to be a member of the FRN!

I find his argument unpersuasive and self serving.

Next, on another thread Sabertooth makes this comment..."This will be a huge blow to their credibility, unfortunately, but to be fair, it wasn't the responsibility of the Swift Vets to triplecheck every allegation. That task belonged to the authors of "Unfit for Command," one of whom, Jerry Corsi, is a Freeper."

There are two issues here. One, Sabertooth is not being truthful. Corsi's comments about sKerrys medals is based on the comments of dozens of other Swifties, not just the commander who backed off on his signed affidavit somewhat today. The fact is he signed the thing and that is what Corsi knew to be a fact. That he has now retracted some is not Corsi's fault and Corsi did his due diligence, but Sabertooth would like you to think he was derelict in some way.

The next issue is that Sabertooth mentions Corsi is a FReeper (he doesn't post under his real name). In a later post, he mentions that he checked DU and they are talking about this, we can assume it may now show up in the media. Why is Sabertooth feeding DU, and by extension the media that is trying to smear the Swifties, information like this?

First he complains that the Swifties left themselves open to lefty attack by associating with know conservatives *gasp* and then proceeds to offer them more grist for their smear machine?

Ya, I think something smells here.

133 posted on 08/06/2004 11:08:58 AM PDT by Bob J (Rightalk.com...coming soon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J

You now specifically site two separate instances, one that happened a while ago where you say ST was sympathetic to Hon (it's his right to be that way, don't you think?); and two, you quote a comment from another thread and drag it over here, along with your assumptions that is "attacking" people.

I doubt very highly that ST is "FEEDING" DU ANYTHING...as if those losers need any help...how disingenuous of you!!!

Personally, I think it matters naught what ST posts; to you anyway.


135 posted on 08/06/2004 11:14:56 AM PDT by Neets (Conservative women LOVE BURLEY MEN, not GIRLIE DEMS.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson