Posted on 08/05/2004 10:10:07 PM PDT by Stoat
The lesson for Texas teens is that the only safe sex is no sex, and that may be a lesson that heads nationwide.
Texas educators are debating what will be taught in new sexual education textbooks for its high school students. The 15-member Texas Board of Education is considering and will likely approve four books, all of which extol the virtues of abstinence. Three make no mention of contraceptives at all while one makes passing reference to condoms.
Critics are crying foul, saying that a lesson of abstinence alone is dangerous because it could lead to more teen pregnancies and more teens becoming infected with sexually transmitted diseases.
The battle in Texas has national implications because the state is the second-biggest market for textbooks in the United States. Books approved by the state's school board are typically marketed nationally.
According to Centers for Disease Control figures, Texas has been among the top five states in the country for teen-age pregnancies for several years.
When he was governor of Texas, George W. Bush pushed for an abstinence-based sexual education curriculum. He raised his concerns to a national level when he said in this year's State of the Union address: "We will double federal funding for abstinence programs, so schools can teach this fact of life: Abstinence for young people is the only certain way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases."
National surveys indicate that a wide majority of parents support a strong abstinence message to teens in sexual education.
TEENS ADVISED TO GET SLEEP
The Texas Freedom Network, a group that regularly battles social and religious conservatives in the state, along with Planned Parenthood and others are asking the board not to approve the four textbooks under consideration.
They say the books are lacking. For example, one textbook under review advises that a good way a teen-ager can prevent a sexually transmitted disease is to get plenty of rest so he or she can have a clear head about sex and choose abstinence.
"The key thing here is that the textbooks do not contain a trace of information about family planning and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases other than through abstinence," said Dan Quinn, a spokesman for the Texas Freedom Network.
Critics want the board to ask the publishers to revise the books to include more information on contraceptives, but the board is expected to approve the books without changes since officials say discussion of contraceptives in their teachers' supplements is enough to meet state curriculum requirements .
"There are other contraceptive methods in addition to abstinence and you are just not going to find it in these textbooks," Quinn said. He charged the textbook publishers have engaged in self-censorship to appease social conservatives in the state at the expense of the health of Texas teen-agers.
The board will meet in September to discuss the books and will vote on whether to approve them in November. If approved, the texts are likely to appear in classrooms in August 2005 -- where they could be the standard text for about 10 years.
Local school districts are not required to use one of the new books but they receive state funding to buy them if they do.
The publishers of the books are Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Glencoe/McGraw Hill and Thomson Delmar Learning.
Some of the books currently in use in the state have more information about contraceptives than the books up for consideration, but once the new books are approved, they will for the most part replace all the current texts.
The education board has been at the center of many political and religious battles over the years including a recent proposal by evangelical Christian groups to have the state's textbooks include items debunking evolution,
Despite opposition, the sex education textbooks under consideration are likely to get approval. State Education Agency officials said mention of condoms and contraceptives in the teacher's editions or in supplements to the books enable them to meet Texas curriculum standards.
Texas standards require sexual education books to "analyze the effectiveness of barrier protection and other contraceptive methods, including the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, keeping in mind the effectiveness of remaining abstinent until marriage."
ABSTINENCE IN TEXAS
Richard Blake, a spokesman for Holt, Rinehart and Winston said his company offers a supplement for students that goes into comprehensive detail about forms of contraceptives.
The supplement for students is free with the purchase of the textbooks. It is excluded from the main text in order to offer flexibility and meet the needs of school boards across the United States that have differing views on how to treat a subject many see as highly sensitive.
"Teachers and educators across the country, and not just in Texas, have told us they wanted it this way," Blake said.
the only safe sex is no sex
** No matter what the sidebar issues are, this is true no how much the kiddie sex crowd says.
I don't think abstinence curriculum can be effective unless it is part of a complete religious education. Someone who is only abstinent for merely their self-interest will just give in when temptation is too strong.
While this may or may not be true, leaving a discussion of contraceptives out of a book on sex intended for today's teens is a rediculous idea.
Every drug store and supermarket I have visited in the last 20 years has contraceptives on display. Pretending they do not exist is just lying to the kids, and they know it is.
Teaching moral judgements based on lies is just plain not going to work.
Teaching contraception as a part of sex ed and then adding a strong dose of values and judgement might work, but leaving contraception out is just a way to have your message dismissed.
>>...abstinence alone is dangerous because it could lead to more teen pregnancies and more teens becoming infected with sexually transmitted diseases.
Typical of Reuters...
I'm sure it's the opposite. It will lead to FEWER pregnancies,
abortions, and STD.
However a lot of sick liberal lolita chasers will get less tail.
More youngsters might vote conservative too when they're
old enough, and the libs are angry over that.
abstinence used to be the standard across the land, and there wasn't much of a teen pregnancy problem.
which lies are you talking about? if you don't have sex, you don't get pregnant, you don't get an STD. There is NO way you can refute that. Show me one person who has gotten in trouble by NOT having sex.
The students are more informed than you think.
What planet was your high school on?
In '59-'63 when I was in high school, and when it was illegal to display condoms, much less mention them in class, there were a substantial number of girls who got pregnant and dropped out of school for that reason. Shotgun weddings were commonplace.
These days they reverse the order--drop out first, then get pregnant.
Conservatives have to start realizing that God gives us sexual maturity at 13 or 14, maybe even earlier these days. The idea that His intent was for us to be celibate (and frustrated) until we reach an age where our society condones marriage (mid 20's for males these days) is not part of my belief system.
Possibly the ideal is earlier marriage, but that has a whole raft of its own problems.
My real point is that we cannot solve a problem by pretending it does not exist.
and you ask me what planet MY high school was on? Apparently mine was on the planet where a "substantial" number of girls" did not have to drop out of school and get married. I used to think like you do.. and then I got saved and decided to fight harder for morality instead of using this give up attitude of "well it's going to happen so we might as well give them condoms"...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.