To: MamaTexan
What the &^#$ is there to 'investigate'? Accomplices?
Accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Maybe prominent accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Maybe prominent ex-President or current Senator accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Maybe prominent current Presidential candidate accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Maybe prominent party leader accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Maybe prominent TV talking head accomplices caught on wiretaps?
Ad infinitum
11 posted on
08/05/2004 3:37:54 PM PDT by
Phsstpok
(often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Phsstpok
Investigating....what else..."the coverup."
22 posted on
08/05/2004 4:05:57 PM PDT by
luvbach1
(Leftists don't acknowledge that Reagan won the cold war because they rooted for the other side.)
To: Phsstpok
23 posted on
08/05/2004 4:09:38 PM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Liberals are like catfish ( all mouth and no brains )(bottom feeders))
To: Phsstpok
I think the second shoe drop in this scandal will be the de-classification of the document that Berger pillaged followed by the discovery that Kerry's February policy statement on port security contains verbatim paragraphs lifted from the, then, Top Secret document.
39 posted on
08/05/2004 4:45:58 PM PDT by
Wil H
To: Phsstpok
Give the man a cigar!
The issue is what did he do with these highly classified documents... Anyone who has had anything to do with Sandy since November may be compromised as well as any conversation... Sorry about that but when you steal national secrets you get special treatment by the counterspy community. And if the conversations lead to other areas of wrong doing by anyone in contact with Berger that's too bad. Follow the leads wherever they go...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson