1 posted on
08/05/2004 9:49:11 AM PDT by
bubman
To: bubman
Does this mean that the Dem talking heads are lining up to move the goal-posts, again?
2 posted on
08/05/2004 9:53:01 AM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: bubman
3 posted on
08/05/2004 9:53:13 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: bubman
Inside look at a typical IEAE meeting
to push for more Islamic and terrorist nuclear weapons.
4 posted on
08/05/2004 9:54:03 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Re: Protection from up on high, Keyser Sose has nothing on Sandy Berger, the DNC Burglar)
To: bubman
i wont believe it till saddam drops a nuke right in downtown, and even then it better have his name on it
To: bubman
In comments that received virtually no press coverage in the United States, Duelfer testified that Iraq was "preserving and expanding its knowledge to design and develop nuclear weapons." One Iraqi laboratory "was intentionally focused on research applicable for nuclear weapons development," the top weapons inspector said. What is CNN......?
:-)
6 posted on
08/05/2004 9:54:42 AM PDT by
maestro
To: bubman
7 posted on
08/05/2004 9:55:42 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: bubman
"There is still no evidence that any US city was ever devastated by an Iraqi nuclear weapon. Therefore, Bush lied to us." [/sarcasm]
9 posted on
08/05/2004 9:56:07 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column)
To: bubman
Nuclear !!!! Clearly a dyslexic wrote this and meant Unclear.
12 posted on
08/05/2004 10:01:44 AM PDT by
jigsaw
(May God Bless Our Troops.)
To: bubman
There were no WMD! Haliburton, Haliburton, Haliburton! Blood for oil! (pant, voice going up an octave) Bush died, people lied! Haliburton! Dis-enfranchised voters! Skull and bones!
Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
13 posted on
08/05/2004 10:04:01 AM PDT by
VRW Conspirator
(It's my turn to decide what the "common good" should be. My turn. My turn. My turn.)
To: bubman
Let's not forget that we DID get our hands on many of Saddam's WMD - the scientists and skilled technicians. It is one thing to find the fish (bombs, shells, poisons, etc.) but quite another to find the fishermen (scientists, etc.) to borrow an old parable.
15 posted on
08/05/2004 10:05:29 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("I actually was going to throw like a man before I threw like a girl." JFK 7/25/2004)
To: bubman
Where is the picture of Daschle being soooo disappointed.
17 posted on
08/05/2004 10:07:11 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(IF IT'S KERRY.....HELL IS ON THE WAY)
To: bubman; StriperSniper; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear weapons development program at the time of the U.S. invasion in March 2003, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer has told Congress.PING!!!!!!!!!!
To: bubman
I'm sure that the reason why President Bush isn't apologizing for the absence of WMD is that President Bush still isn't convinced that there wasn't WMD, and I've heard him say as much in interviews. But what he needs to do is to tell the American people, "It's possible that there were no WMD in Iraq but we haven't finished our investigations. Rather than rushing into a statement that may have to be corrected later, I'm withholding my final judgement until the investigation is done.'
To: bubman
This article has been posted to DoctorZins New News Blog!
32 posted on
08/05/2004 11:28:36 AM PDT by
DoctorZIn
(Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
To: bubman; Carl/NewsMax
33 posted on
08/05/2004 12:03:11 PM PDT by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson