Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Only supportive information that fleshes out the accusations will elevate the argument. The liar label, alone, simply won't cut it.

I thought it was well done for the initial foray into the public consciousness. It was short, punchy, and direct. They did more than just call Kerry a liar, they also presented their bona fides. The picture of each one of them, then and now, and their rank and medals were powerful images. A few, like Doctor Letson, O'Dell, and Chenoweth, gave some more specifics about what Kerry was lying about. I view this as the opening salvo in a long, nasty war.

The ad took one minute--a good length for a political add and cost effective in terms of buying air time.

276 posted on 08/04/2004 8:34:41 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

good points.

see my answers 365 and 366.

I suppose my main point is that it could have been even more powerful... and it could have minimized the risk of being dismissed out of hand by the lefties if it contained specifics.

Text overlay or directions to a web site with details would have been a time- and cost-effective way of accomplishing this.


369 posted on 08/05/2004 4:17:21 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson