Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
Kerry is a weak campaigner. Barring some kind of national disaster, his best shot is the debates. Democratic true believers think he'll kill Bush, one on one. That's what they thought about Al Gore, too.

Bush is a much better speaker than he was 4 yrs. ago (couldn't be much worse). I think the key is he is now much more emotionally connected with what he is saying, i.e., he is doing what he truly believes in.

Kerry is the opposite. He can't say what he is truly thinking or feeling, and therefore already restricts himself to babbling.

I think Kerry will only be a big bag of gas at the debates.

11 posted on 08/04/2004 4:28:15 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jalapeno
>>He can't say what he is truly thinking or feeling, and therefore already restricts himself to babbling.<<

Good point.

If he says what he thinks, he's toast!

If he says what he doesn't think, he can be pointed out as a hypocrite...and he's still toast!

18 posted on 08/04/2004 4:36:29 AM PDT by evad (Tax Man and Tort Boy..remolding America in their image)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno

I'm thinking that such a debate will involve JFnK using a lot of verbal tricks against the President's very solid positions, and then looking smug, as if he's accomplishing something. And I think that will make Kerry look like even more of an effete smartass, lacking gravitas.

The President needs to bring out and put on display Kerry's ponderousness, as well as his vacillating indecisiveness. Then, when JFnK starts acting decisive and tries to portray a strong position, frontally attack his position as wrongheaded, impossible, or dangerous. IMHO.


29 posted on 08/04/2004 4:46:21 AM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno
Kerry is the opposite. He can't say what he is truly thinking or feeling, and therefore already restricts himself to babbling.
I can't watch Kerry on tv for more than a minute - he never says anything of substance, just speaks in vague generalities ("we must move forward", "a better America"). And his delivery seems like monotone droning - even when he's not reading a speech, it sounds like he is. It sounds like he doesn't believe in what he's saying, and isn't excited about it. No charisma, no spontenaity. And most important - no detectable sense of humor.

On a more positive note, Kerry may help scientists find a cure for insomnia (hey, algore invented the internet, it could happen).

46 posted on 08/04/2004 5:18:54 AM PDT by searchandrecovery (Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno

Kerry could debate himeself-first he argues one side of an issue then he argues the other side of an issue. He can back both up by using his Senate votes.....It's the complexity don't you know?


64 posted on 08/04/2004 5:53:03 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson