Laura Bush on O'Reilly Tonight (8/3)

Fox News | 8/3/04 | self

[baseballmom]

Laura Bush is going to be a guest on O'Reilly tonight at 8:00 EDT

[montag813]

Laura looked beautiful

Yes but she need to get rid of those lines between her tip lip and nose. 5 minutes with collagen and a needle.

[nutmeg]

FoxFan ping!

Darn, sorry I'm late with this one. O'Reilly's show re-airs at 4am ET, according to my on-screen guide.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

[montag813]

I instinctively knew Heather would get a job.

Heather Nauert is the dumbest chick on FoxNews. By far the worst interviewer on TV.

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

She was great. The campaign strategists should let us see and hear more from her.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

We agree on many things, but wow - the woman is in her fifties, and she looks great. I don't need her to look air-brushed, myself.

[Iowa Granny]

Heather Nauert is the dumbest chick on FoxNews. By far the worst interviewer on TV.

Heather is a stand up reporter, not an interviewer.

Perhaps some day she will have a stable of sources to rely on for her information, like Rita does.

[cpforlife.org]

"Is Laura Bush pro-choice? I hate the term, but is she?"

Sadly yes. So is former 1st Lady Barbara Bush.

[montag813]

Heather is a stand up reporter, not an interviewer. Perhaps some day she will have a stable of sources to rely on for her information, like Rita does.

I saw two interviews she gave on the Gibson show, coincidentally both with Arabs (Saudi spokesperson and Palestinian official) in which they made absurdly false assertions that went completely unchallenged or even questioned by Nauert. She doesn't need more sources. She needs to be better informed. Or perhaps she is an Arab stooge.

[Cedar]

Didn't know Laura was pro-choice, what a shock! She needs to be shown photographs of aborted babies...surely if she saw the horror of it she would change her mind.

I'm so glad Pres. Bush is strongly pro-life. This is the main reason I support him.

[cpforlife.org]

"I'm so glad Pres. Bush is strongly pro-life. This is the main reason I support him."

First I am also voting for Bush, in fact I'm doing some local work related to the reelection.

But I have to respond to your "Bush is strongly pro-life" While he is clearly "Pro-Life" he does list rape & incest as exceptions and I think life of the Mother. Solid Pro-Lifers know this was the precursor to Roe. & the holocaust.

On the logistical side of overturning Roe v Wade he has not been great. He has not acted as a committed 100% Pro-Life Christian would.

Case in point:

Sen. Arlen Specter of PA is a rabid pro-abort. Voted against Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court & a 20+ year track record of anti-life/family voting. Next session of Congress he will be the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee--the top dog who reviews Federal Judgeship appointments.

With all this in mind Bush and Rick Santorum both helped w major campaigning & fund-raising for a Specter win in the primary over a committed pro-lifer, Pat Toomey.

ALL the pros say that if Bush & Santorum would have stayed home Toomey would have won because it was so close a race. Toomey most certainly would have won if they put their efforts in for his side.

So Bush knows full well that if/when he nominates another Robert Bork Specter will stop him.

Their excuse is that Specter has so much seniority & power they had to do it for the good of the party. Loyalty to a demon is more important than for the babies.

The sad reality is that people think politics will end it--it CANNOT. I've been studying this for years and wrote a booklet & strategy located at http://www.CpForLife.org

Kevin

[Republic]

What kind of surprises me is that AOL has a poll going on their main page regarding Laura and her comment that perhaps the press is responsible for the polarization of our nation.

FIFTY EIGHT PERCENT say it is! and NINETY PERCENT say there is too much opinion slipped into news coverage!!!!

I was SHOCKED (and be AOL is too--they used just about the most ugly pic I have ever seen of Laura above their polling question!)

[Cedar]

You are certainly right. I couldn't believe Bush, and especially Rick Santorum, supported Specter. I've read responses here at FR that said Toomey just couldn't win in the fall election (thus the reasoning--just get a Repub. in there, even if it is Specter). Since I'm not from that area, I don't know the truth of that.

And again you're right: if Bush allows for abortion in cases of rape, incest, or save the life of the mother, then he would not be considered strongly pro-life. I stand corrected.

Guess I am so grateful that he signed the ban on partial-birth abortions and also stopped the military funding for abortions (I believe so, yes?).

And also I'm glad that he is against embryonic stem cell research.

Kerry would be just the opposite on these vital issues--what a disaster.

So I greatly appreciate Bush's actions so far, though I still can't believe he backed Specter.

Your website is great, and you bring up what has to be the most neglected area for pro-lifers: teaching the children at school. I've not ever considered this much at all, and there must be thousands of pro-lifers like me who focus so much on changing the adult mind.

You have really found a vital key. Have you talked with the National Right to Life leadership in Washington, DC, about this? There must be some way to begin this instruction in all private pro-life schools as soon as possible. The leadership at the top nation-wide, along with smaller local private schools, needs to be put in motion with this. Maybe someone like James Dobson (Focus on the Family) would also be a good one to contact and help get this going.