Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Balancing Security And Liberty
The Washington Post ^ | 01 August 2004 | Charles Moskos

Posted on 08/03/2004 12:46:40 PM PDT by steve-b

When you board a plane, both you and your carry-on bags are searched. A civilian employee of the Transportation Security Administration may open and search your checked luggage as well. Although primarily looking for security threats, workers report any illegal or suspicious objects to a supervisor or law enforcement agent, even if the object represents no danger to the flight.

Two legal concepts allow both you and your bags to be searched despite the Constitution's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. By being in an airport and trying to board a plane, the Supreme Court says, you have given "implied consent" to being searched. The "plain view" principle, according to the court, states that whatever law enforcement legally finds, feels or sees -- even if unrelated to the original investigation or search -- is fair game for arrest and prosecution....

The solution -- the balancing of public safety with constitutional liberties -- is surprisingly simple. The only way to prevent creeping use of implied consent is to limit the doctrine of plain view. Before searching a person, the government must choose either plain view or implied consent. If the government must search without probable cause, let it search, but only for illegal weapons or bombs. If security outweighs the Fourth Amendment, the scope of such searches must be limited to objects representing a clear and present danger to public safety. Any unrelated suspicious or illegal objects found must be ignored...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; billofrights; impliedconsent; liberty; plainview; police; privacy; search; security
The proposed solution seems like an elegant and sensible way to maintain the ability to conduct security searches when they are legitimately necessary while preventing it from growing into police-state harassment.
1 posted on 08/03/2004 12:46:46 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b
i remember when it was just guns or butter
2 posted on 08/03/2004 2:44:23 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The regulations have gotten out of hand. We cannot allow the killer fingernail clippers or knitting needles on an airplane. Can you imagine someone trying to hijack a plane with fingernail clippers?

Stay back or I'll clip your eyelashes off!

3 posted on 08/03/2004 3:38:04 PM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson