Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead

In Perlstein's article on people who love Bush, I wondered why he painted conservatives/Republicans as people who change the subject if they don't have a good answer, when that's exactly what liberals/Democrats do.


39 posted on 08/03/2004 12:23:57 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand
"In Perlstein's article on people who love Bush, I wondered why he painted conservatives/Republicans as people who change the subject if they don't have a good answer, when that's exactly what liberals/Democrats do."

Because by projecting their own tactics onto conservatives, Dems hope to put us on the defensive. Keeping your opponent on the defensive is the way to prevent them from launching a counter attack. When that doesn't work, they scream bloody murder at about 110 decibles, until the opposition is silenced. That's why I don't watch shows like Hannity and Colmes anymore (though I do listen to his radio show)

89 posted on 08/03/2004 12:35:16 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

In Perlstein's article on people who love Bush, I wondered why he painted conservatives/Republicans as people who change the subject if they don't have a good answer, when that's exactly what liberals/Democrats do.
---
firebrand, I'm afraid you're going to have to argue with THIS liberal/Democrat, not "liberals/Democrats" in the abstract. I'm not going to skip a single question today. The fact is, all humans have a fight or flight reflex. My problem with the conservatives I wrote about is that I found their changing the subject especially egregious, especially since they invited me into their homes, knowing I was a liberal, to discuss Bush.


223 posted on 08/03/2004 1:07:43 PM PDT by Perlstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

It is a commie tactic, they accuse their opponents of what they are guilty of doing.


676 posted on 08/03/2004 4:06:43 PM PDT by jincarolina (liberty is from God, liberties from the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand; dead; Perlstein; shaggy eel; MeekOneGOP

<< In Perlstein's article on people who love Bush, I wondered why he painted conservatives/Republicans as people who change the subject if they don't have a good answer, when that's exactly what liberals/Democrats do. >>

[Psycho?]Pathological Projection Syndrome is the definitive sypmtom of the Liberal Psychosis and is suffered by every "Democrat."

That is, by all too stupid to know they are being lied to and/or too mean-spirited and/or greedy to care -- by those who comprise the bottom half of the wrong side of the Bell Curve [AKA "The 'Democrats'' base"] -- and by those gangsters [AKA "DemocRAT" politicians] who comprise the vast organized-criminal enterprizes we euphamistically and generously know as the "'DemocRAT' party" -- and who, consequential to a cynical "career" choice, lie for a "living."

[Psycho?]Pathological Projection Syndrome is also demonstrated by all who comprise the so-called "mainstream media" [Also -- and less generously, perhaps, known as the Verbalized-Bowel-Bubbles and Bloviators Brigades.

Another sure giveaway of those whose political platform is constructed and stands upon the position that it is "law" and not crime if the gang is large enough that steals and confiscates the wealth of those who create it and squanders it to buy the favor and the votes of those parasites who would so elect them to power -- and uses it also to enrichen themselves and their patrons, intimates, enablers and facilitators -- is that they never call a spade a spade. Apart, that is, from being skilled looters, liars and thieves -- they are adept only at inventing the appearance of "good motive" to cover up their evil intent."

None of their "elected" has ever had a real job or met a non-public-purse payroll and in our still somewhat, thank God, FRee Republic, they are successful only to the extent they can sell their lies to sufficient numbers and/or perpetrate sufficient massive electoral fraud to "elect" themselves to the offices they would never attain on the merits of the truth about themselves, their lack of any recognizable talent, creativity, innovation, productivity and/or industry -- or upon the Truth as to their actual intententions.

Kerry and his trial-liar running mate, lacking on the one hand the ability to lie convincingly -- and on the other the ability to lie convincingly to an audience as smart as is the American electorate -- are doomed to fail.

Especially given that Attorney-General Ashcroft's men are aggressively identifying and eliminating the mass-electoral frauds by way of which the appearance of support for "Democrats" and the outcome of elections are often altered, this year United States of America's President and Armed-Forces Commander-In-Chief, George Walker Bush, will win by a larger than 10% margin and by an Electoral College-dictated minimum 44 States to a maximum 6, plus DC.

Best ones -- Brian

BUMPping


946 posted on 08/03/2004 11:10:44 PM PDT by Brian Allen (I am, thank God, a hyphenated American -- An AMERICAN-American -- and A Dollar-a-Day FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson