Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strategy Memo: The Democratic Convention and Its Effect on the Presidential Race
George W. Bush ^ | August 3, 2004

Posted on 08/03/2004 10:37:50 AM PDT by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: gameraandgyaos
"The jobs numbers out on Friday are crucial. If the numbers come out stronger than expected, then the economy has a good chance of performing strongly throughout the fall. If, however, the jobs numbers are again dissapointing, then the slowdown can become a successful issue for the Dems. It's almost a make or break moment."

Nonsense. What mediot filled your head with such rubbish? I want her name.

Creating a quarter of a million jobs per month in the "soft landing" phase of a recovery is the *most* that can be expected. Any higher number would cause the fed to step in with yet another rate hike to slow down the overall economy some more.

Moreover, we've already got full employment. 5.6% unemployment is historically low; it's very difficult to create vast numbers of new jobs when almost everyone who wants a job is already employed, after all.

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

21 posted on 08/03/2004 12:14:02 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

Bad analogy: Wilson wasnt running *and* the economy in 1920 was in recession.

1920 was a bit like 1952 or 1968, repudiation of an incumbent no longer running.

1920 was like what 1992 would have been if Bush 41 not only screwed up the economy but had a foreign policy everyone hated.


This race has shades of 1996 and shades of 1984.


22 posted on 08/03/2004 12:18:30 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

Bad analogy: Wilson wasnt running *and* the economy in 1920 was in recession.

1920 was a bit like 1952 or 1968, repudiation of an incumbent no longer running.

1920 was like what 1992 would have been if Bush 41 not only screwed up the economy but had a foreign policy everyone hated.

This race has shades of 1996 and shades of 1984. BUT EVERY RACE IS UNIQUE - we should win but can take nothing for granted. Kerry has more money and the most biased media in our lifetimes on his side.

we just have the better candidate.


23 posted on 08/03/2004 12:21:00 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
If we relax now, we are through.

One thing I have admired about the President since the 2000 South Carolina Primary is his seeminly instinctive understanding of the importance of keeping your foot on your opponent's neck when he is down. I have every reason to believe he will do so in this case, as well. If the President is up by ten, he will try to win by twenty. That just seems to be his nature.

24 posted on 08/03/2004 12:22:42 PM PDT by bondjamesbond (We live in a wonderful country where any child can grow up to be the next Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

ping for a GREAT GRAPHIC!!!


25 posted on 08/03/2004 12:22:42 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson