Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper

Then how do you explain the fact that her DNA and Kobe's DNA were found on Kobe, but not Mr. X's?

Because if the sex was before Kobe, it stands to reason that if it was still in her the day of the rape exam, then it was in her when she claims Kobe raped her.


96 posted on 08/03/2004 5:54:27 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

The prosecutor claims transfer and I'll wait for the entire testimony.

You would concede if the donor was not physically with her after she was with Bryant and that is proven, the question you pose is moot, true?


99 posted on 08/03/2004 5:57:00 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson