Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

The prosecutor claims transfer and I'll wait for the entire testimony.

You would concede if the donor was not physically with her after she was with Bryant and that is proven, the question you pose is moot, true?


99 posted on 08/03/2004 5:57:00 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper

Transfer of this amount is impossible cyn.
This case is now into the realm of malicious
prosecution and that is the statement and the
opinion of Catherine Crier, former prosecutor
and judge, and she so stated this on her national
TV program.

The DNA is FRESHER than the trace amount of Kobe's.
Now facts can be pesky when you don't want to believe
them.


107 posted on 08/03/2004 6:01:11 PM PDT by onyx (The FRENCH capitulate. Are you FRENCH or GOP? BUSH/CHENEY '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

Oh, dear.

The prosecutor has backed off the "transfer" theory.

How would you explain motile sperm getting from a pair of underpants to her cervix?


117 posted on 08/03/2004 6:10:49 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
You would concede if the donor was not physically with her after she was with Bryant and that is proven, the question you pose is moot, true?

Of course it's moot.

But it won't be. Anybody who reads the transcripts from yesterday knows SOMEBODY was with her after Kobe.

122 posted on 08/03/2004 6:16:36 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson