[Donna Lee Nardo]

"...unknowingly picking up something we thought belonged to everyone really was someone else's property"

This is what is terribly confusing. I did not do the above whatsoever at all in any of my posts. NOT ONCE. NOT EVER. NOT AT ALL.

So my posts were perfectly fine except that I mentioned an "unmentionable site" in one post in passing. And even though it had nothing to do with site "content," and it was mentioned in a historical overview of hunting sites, we still should play on the safe side and not even so much as mention the "unmentionable." I get it now.

It has nothing to do with IH then. We need to be clear about what is being said and not cause confusion by tiptoeing around this. Many of us don't understand all of what has happened in the recent past; we know bits and pieces and much hearsay. We need explicit directions then.

So IH posts continue to be welcome here. Good. Just the same, I will doublecheck on IH's side.

I just wish that everyone here would give the IH posters the proper ID when posting from there. This has bothered me for some time and I am also happy to have the opportunity to address it. It is only professional courtesy. We need to be careful and make sure we cite all the credit for any given post.

[MamaDearest]

The ONLY criteria I think is important here is that we not use any material for which JR or FR can be further threatened or litigated. If in doubt, check with the Admin. Mod., but please protect our thread first and foremost. Without it, we disseminate no information at all. It's really just common sense in light of what we've already been through here. No harm meant Donna Lee.

[JustPiper]

We need to be careful and make sure we cite all the credit for any given post

And the discredit for erroneous info ;)

The only thing I hate is not knowing who is truly behind a 'handle'