Helloooo, you bigoted moron. Less people are serving because we are not now, and have not for two generations, fought a war in which 4 million Americans are in arms on uniform. THAT -- history, you shm*ck -- is why it is less common for the children and grandchildren to be serving.
So it doesn't have a rat's *ss to do with anyone's "assumption that someone else" will be fighting. And as for the fairness of who is serving and who is not, we now have a volunteer army -- so no one is there who does not choose to be. I spit on the New York Times.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Down the Memory Hole: Joseph Wilson Disappears"
If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.
Well you had a stronger reaction to those sentences than I did. I think I see your point. Although in all honesty it seems reasonable for the author to point out that military service is much less common now than it used to be, and far fewer Americans (even veterans) know someone who is serving now.
I think that you might want to make that closer to 16 million - during WWII. Today, we have less than 10% of that number in uniform.
What I resent so much is that Kerry is reopening decades old wounds for millions of us.
Nam Vet