Posted on 07/31/2004 9:10:22 AM PDT by ShelleyAa
Kerry is missing a few valuable pages
For months, with utter amazement Americans watched John F. Kerry move aggressively towards Democrat Party nomination with little effort given in providing needed credentials for employment. In depth, examining interviews by media elite as a whole, both sparse and fleeting have allowed we the employer to see very little of what makes this man, who may be president, tick. Why so little scrutiny given Senator John F. Kerry? One would think that in applying for the number one job in the nation, his resume would need to be in entirety before consideration.
Many have heard left-leaning media and spin misters state that this election is all about President Bush, whether he has earned the right to lead another four years. Is that a true statement? Is not the election about both President Bush and Senator John F. Kerry and which of the two has the best, most complete resume, which shows one’s leadership and character qualifications? Do we as the employer not have the right to view all the pages of his biography, not just the ones that Democrats deem necessary?
Before this election, American citizens have not only the right, but also an obligation, as those on the selection committee, to see who best fills the position. After 911, the importance of venting thoroughly all candidates is of utmost importance. Slick packaging is a luxury of the past.
Just who is John F. Kerry? Did we really find out during the Democrat National Convention? We certainly heard about his few months in Vietnam, but what about the words he spoke about atrocities when he returned. We know that he has been a Senator for almost 20 years, what bills bear his name? Has he shown leadership, or showmanship? As designated thee most liberal Senator in the Senate today, what does he stand for? How does his apparent socialistic ideology pertain to how he would govern? As a fierce critic of the war in Iraq (as of today) and someone who claims 20/20 hindsight, should he not be required to give details, not just unsubstantiated rhetoric. Just because Kerry and his party say that President Bush lied, does that make it so? In addition, as the providers of the monies, do the citizens not have a right to find out how his taxing the hard workers of America will specifically improve our lot. Also, with his love for UN leadership, need for world admiration, and distaste for preemptive strikes, do terrorist find him more appealing and should that be concerning?
Will Senator John F. Kerry be the first man chosen president that will not have to be accountable to those that would select him? It may happen if we the people walk away from our responsibility and allow a coronation rather democracy to take place. 911 changed our world; Americans must understand the importance of a reading of all Kerry’s pages and demanding they all be provided no matter how hard the media scream and kick. It has to be required summer reading for all on the selection committee, our nation depends on it.
No sense of irony here?
It's those f'n baloons, I tell ya.
The difference being, President Bush provided all, and Kerry well he really does not need provide as long as he hates Bush, right?
If I ever seen someone less qualified to be President it is Kerry. Can we afford to elect a man that has no idea from right and wrong and who just plain lies. We had one lier for 8 years and America suffered badly. If it wasn't for the Republican Senate and House for the last 4 years of his term, we would have gotten nothing done. All his last years was to sign on the dotted line. Remember "Contract for America".
The balloons were symbolic of the whole convention.
THESE bills bear his name:
In 1994, Senator Kerry sponsored Deficit Reduction Act of 1994 S.1826 (the 103rd Congress), pulling billions of funding for Intelligence and key defense programs in 1994 and then killing the programs outright in subsequent years. It is right there in the Congressional Record. See for yourself. Just a perusal of the bill's sections is enough to make you realize this guy is the most dangerous man in America.
In 2002 he filed 5 consecutively numbered bills in the Senate all with substantially the same title "To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of tomato sauce preparation." S. 2378 - 2382, 107th Congress. Tell me this wasn't some sort of conflict of interest! What's he doing legislating for the missus?
The omission of key facts is the first stage of re-educating uninformed voters. The news media deliberately omits key pieces of information from the mainstream reporting in an attempt to change the factual appearance of the news item. Kerry's omission of his whole congressional record of service is not even being mentioned by the mainstream media.
Smart people research the facts. Useful idiots take limited information and reinforce it with emotional appeal rather than intellectual reason. The sad part of all of this is the taking for granted that everything that is said must be true, but only when Democrats speak. Everyone else is a liar. The polls will not lie in November. Kerry and his party will come crashing down to the levels they deserve.
Agree. I think that Kerry is far worse than Clinton and far more dangerous. A socialist at heart - I truly fear what damage he could do in no time at all.
Thanks for the links. Wow! I had not read that before(tomato sauce) - unbelievable.
I think he needs to release his medical records. Isn't he a cancer survivor? I would like to know more about his health.
Just like NY's Jr. Senator... Never said one word that wasn't an tag line
"The omission of key facts is the first stage of re-educating uninformed voters."
"Smart people research the facts. Useful idiots take limited information and reinforce it with emotional appeal rather than intellectual reason."
Your words are so true. The problem comes in what to do about it? Any suggestions?
I had forgot about her. YOu are right, she got a way with murder. Will JFK?
I agree, his medical papers should also be provided. If he were a GOPer I am sure we would already have seen them.
Did they serve just four months in Vietnam as their commander did? Or were they stuck there while Kerry made his way back to the States leaving, as he put it, Nixon's war. BTW, Kerry came back in 1969. Nixon was inaugurated in January, 1969. It was hardly "Nixon's war" at that point.
As near as we can tell, John Kerry was the only guy that got injured on his swift boat. Three times in four months...sounds to me like hanging around with John Kerry was like flirting with disaster.
Well, tired or not, Kerry is dangerous and it is time we take our eyes off of ourself and start thinking about what is best for our children and grandchildren. Nothing should be more important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.