Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carrier’s run-in with dhow raises red flags
THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT ^ | 7/31/2004 | MATTHEW DOLAN

Posted on 07/31/2004 5:10:20 AM PDT by csvset

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: First_Salute
I agree. If a small boat can get alongside our carriers without anybody noticing, then something is seriously wrong either with our technology or our personnel. I'm guessing the latter.

Let me go out on a limb here and predict that a female sailor was somehow involved.

41 posted on 07/31/2004 7:59:58 AM PDT by snopercod (Quatro por las quatro con la Quatro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Southack; Oldexpat; Captain Rhino; aomagrat
Yes, trees, leaves, snow, anything that is not dielectrically matched to free space will reflect radar energy. (Stealth coatings are dielectrically matched to free space, but very lossy, analogous to a resistive load at the end of a transmission line.) I remember watching the raw video on the surface surveillance radar at Logan Airport. (Basically a 72" marine radar using the short range waveform and different signal processing. It also spun at 60 RPM, vs. 22 RPM typical of marine radar, so it go fewer pulses to integer per scan.) I could clearly see the wake of a small fiberglass or wooden boat on the Mystic River, a couple of miles away. The wake was not apparent visually. (Fiberglass is probably a lot better matched dielectrically than wood. Anything wet will reflect.) The boat itself was easily tracked. Of course, the control tower wasn't moving at 30 knots, but it was engaged in heavy "flight-ops".

The antenna was mounted on the roof of the terminal building below the control tower, roughly about the same height above the water as on a carrier, so the situations would be analogous.

I was also the lead systems engineer on a team that designed the "leisure boat" radar sold by the leading US manufacturer of high seas navigational radar. Our "baseline" design was the high seas models, with smaller antennas and displays. Even on small radar (about $1,000 FOB retail) I would be amazed if a dhou wasn't readily detectable as soon as it broke the horizon.

You guys got me thinking, "Has anyone from Al-Queda seen the African Queen?" You could take a dhou, punch a hole in its buoyant hull, and fill it with explosives until it just maintained positive buoyancy, then drag it into waters where you expect aircraft carriers to operate. The mostly submerged derelict would more resemble a submarine (the Hunley comes to mind) than a ship and would not be readily detectable on radar.

42 posted on 07/31/2004 8:00:23 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ideas so stupid only intellectuals could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: csvset
In April, three crew members from the Virginia Beach-based Firebolt died after a dhow exploded near the coastal patrol boat’s boarding team in the Persian Gulf.

Granted my new son was one month old when this happened, but I don't remember this incident being in the national news. Googling 'Firebolt' and 'dhow' mostly comes up with Navy-themed websites. I wonder why this didn't make a bigger splash.

43 posted on 07/31/2004 8:05:58 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
A dhow would show up as a BOOMING target on a navigational radar, except in high seas or heavy rain, both of which are rare in the Gulf. In the clear, detection ranges should be at least 10 miles. Even in poor weather it would be detectable for several miles.

And you would think they'd have had P-3 or S-3s in support, or at least SH-60s. The look down radar in those (all are variations on the same basic design) can detect and track a subs periscope, which is a pretty small target. F/A-18s radar, while not quite so good against small surface targets, should be able to detect a small boat as well.

44 posted on 07/31/2004 8:11:48 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LS
Umm, stupid here, but what's a "dhow"?

It's what Jones uses to compute the Industrial Average.

45 posted on 07/31/2004 8:13:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"I could clearly see the wake of a small fiberglass or wooden boat on the Mystic River, a couple of miles away. The wake was not apparent visually. (Fiberglass is probably a lot better matched dielectrically than wood. Anything wet will reflect.) The boat itself was easily tracked."

No one is disputing that boat wakes can be tracked by radar; but was this wooden dhow moving or anchored?

If anchored or drifting (i.e. no wake), can our radar detect a wooden boat?

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

46 posted on 07/31/2004 8:19:16 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Our radar picks up trees now?! Dhow's are made of wood, you know...

I've seen SAR (synthetic aperature radar) images where you could see the trees, along with their radar shadow. (One of those images was on the cover of the '93 Radar Symposium Proceedings) A cruise missle, seen head on, is probably a much smaller RCS target (although there you have the detection advantage that the thing is moving relative to the background clutter from the surface). Point being yes, trees and slab sided wooden hulls do reflect radar energy, although a little higher frequency than the typical surface search radar, like those in aircraft) will result in a higher RCS for the wooden ship.

47 posted on 07/31/2004 8:19:44 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Southack

A dhou, I believe, should easily be detected. The sensitivity of the marine navigational radar on carriers is about right to detect a man at four nautical miles, "in the clear". It would take a lot of rain or high seas to hide a dhou.

Could have been lack of vigilance by the crew, as some have suggested or a partially submerged derelict, as I suggested.

Another possibility occured to me as well. The Gulf is notorious for "ducted propagation". Under these conditions, an evaporative duct occurs about 100 feet above the surface of the water which traps radio waves. It acts sort of like an optical fiber, bending the path and trapping it near the surface. This leads to vastly increased sensitivity to surface targets.

However, the duct can cut both ways and there is real world experience that it does. The Cheasepeake Pilots Association found that under hot humid conditions, their shore based marine radar could not detect large vessels that were clearly visible by naked eye. What was happening, apparently, was that the antenna was located above the top of the evaporative duct, and the wave glanced off the top of the duct without illuminating the ship target. The height of evaporative ducts varies and if the duct were low enough, the same thing could have occurred to the Kennedy.


48 posted on 07/31/2004 8:55:20 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ideas so stupid only intellectuals could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: csvset
OK, I call for mounting Phalanx CIWS vulcan mini guns below the flight deck with the ability to counter close in small craft threats. Radar won't do any good detecting a boat like a dhow, but there ARE other sensor systems available (Mark 1 eyeball, if nothing else).


49 posted on 07/31/2004 9:13:19 AM PDT by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"Another possibility occured to me as well. The Gulf is notorious for "ducted propagation". Under these conditions, an evaporative duct occurs about 100 feet above the surface of the water which traps radio waves."

Evaporation is generally a daytime phenomenon; this event occured at night.

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

50 posted on 07/31/2004 9:17:02 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; csvset
Small wooden boat? I'm not surprised at all that it didn't show up on radar,

They might if the people on board were wearing tin foil hats.


51 posted on 07/31/2004 9:28:37 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: csvset
these dhows are like gnats to ships on the gulf.

Dhows move to slowly to get away from a Carrier at night time or the Morning or Evening because they can't be seen.

Carriers are heard but not seen in this case, all you hear is the airplanes.

The bad thing is, Carriers can see the Dhows allot of time but can maneuver because of flight ops or due to the narrow channels that are used for the Carrier sometime. The gulf is really shallow for a Carrier, sometime they operate in channels that are only as wide as the Carrier is long. It is often times a very difficult environment to work in and not have something not go perfectly right.
52 posted on 07/31/2004 9:29:57 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Sailing ships have Right of Way over powered vessels. Perhaps the skipper was a lawyer.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. With no facts at hand, I suspect it was a smuggler, hence no grieving widows.

It does show though, that low-tech can sometimes compromise hi-tech. We shouldn't place so much blind faith in technology.


53 posted on 07/31/2004 10:01:55 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

There are generally around 5,500 crewmembers aboard an aircraft carrier.


54 posted on 07/31/2004 10:13:16 AM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack

True, but didn't say if it was 0300 HR local time or 0800 HR. Dunno, but I think a partially submerged derelict (deliberate or not) is more likely.


55 posted on 07/31/2004 10:28:31 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ideas so stupid only intellectuals could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: texas booster
Probably a smugglers ship, but couldn't the dhow have heard the takeoffs? Even if the Kennedy was blacked out, making it hard to see, it is difficult to sleep when jets are flying 200' over yer head.

I'm former Army and have never been on a carrier at sea, however the article says nothing about takeoffs, it says air operations. If you are moving fast, into the wind, and recovering aircraft it is possible that a small boat would neither see nor hear you.

I moved offshore rigs, crossed the English Channel by boat and been on a bunch of fishing boats in shipping lanes. I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often.

56 posted on 07/31/2004 10:46:11 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (Bush, DeLay and Armstrong - Good to be a Texan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"The Kennedy had only been in the gulf for 12 days when it struck the dhow at about 10:20 p.m. during night flight operations."

Low chance of evaporation...

5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

57 posted on 07/31/2004 11:04:50 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Good point, I was only throwing ducting out as a possibility, I agree it would be unlikely to persist that late in the evening. I still like the possibility of a partially submerged derelict.


58 posted on 07/31/2004 11:22:34 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ideas so stupid only intellectuals could believe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; First_Salute

Not to mention a torpedo tube equipped dhow.......

Unbelievable..but I guess no more unbelievable than bands of ME males with expired visas being let go scott free. Hell, why bother with interdiction!

This boat should have been detected [primary targets not made of metal used to shown up on Earthling's radars...has something changed with the laws of matter??] and blown out of the water before it got close. But of course I'll be flamed by idiots calling me a "back seat" captain...eventually I'll have the last laugh.


59 posted on 07/31/2004 2:17:57 PM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

They already are......


60 posted on 07/31/2004 3:02:07 PM PDT by CTOCS (Erections lasting more than four hours, while rare, require immediate medical attention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson