Posted on 07/30/2004 7:53:35 PM PDT by phil_will1
The Democrats have a new charge against the Republicans: tax code complexity is way up in recent years. House Democrats, led by Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, intend to make rising tax complexity an election year issue. Republicans are devoting floor time to tax simplification in the House this week, but there is no denying that they have dropped the ball on this growing problem.
After the GOP assumed power in 1995, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Archer promised to "rip the income tax out by its roots." In a 1996 report, Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich argued: "The current tax system is indefensible. It is overly complex, burdensome, and severely limits economic opportunity for all Americans. We made clear on the very first day of the 104th Congress that our top priority would be to change the status quo . . . there is no status quo that needs more fundamental changing than our tax system."
Unfortunately, it was all talk with little action: The GOP has not moved major tax reform legislation through Congress. Republicans did enact tax cuts in 1997, 2001, and 2003 that included pro-growth reforms. However, many features of these bills increased tax code complexity. For example, the 1997 bill included 11 narrow education tax breaks including a tuition tax credit, an education IRA, and a student loan interest deduction.
The result has been that tax complexity has spiraled upward, as the table shows. After a decade of GOP rule, the number of pages of federal tax rules (tax code, regulations, and IRS rulings) has increased almost 50 percent. Tax forms and instructions are longer, individuals are spending more on tax advice, and there are more social engineering provisions in the code.
Yet there is no shortage of simplification ideas that might gain bipartisan support. In 2001, the Joint Committee on Taxation issued a 1,300-page report full of reform proposals, such as abolishing the alternative minimum tax, a complex add-on tax that will hit 30 million households by 2010. Steny Hoyer recently noted that "we need to obviously deal with the AMT." The GOP ignored the JCT report when it came out, but now they should challenge Hoyer and the Democrats to help them repeal the AMT and pursue other reforms.
In the 1980s, tax reform was a bipartisan concern. Prominent Democrats, such as Dick Gephardt, and liberal think tanks, such as the Brookings Institution, proposed some serious reform plans. Democrats introduced flat tax legislation long before Dick Armey proposed his plan in 1994. Within months of economists Robert Hall and Alvin Rabushka unveiling the original flat tax in 1981, Senator Dennis DeConcini of Arizona and Representative Leon Panetta of California introduced versions in Congress.
Unfortunately, when the Democrats became the minority party in the 1990s, they became reactionary on tax policy. They focused on throwing darts at Republican tax reform plans, and offered few ideas of their own. The Clinton administration showed no interest in tax reform, and hardly seemed to think that rising complexity was a problem.
Of course, there is election-year politics at play when Hoyer calls the tax code an "embarrassment" and Democrat Rahm Emmanuel of Illinois says, "If you're a lawyer or an accountant, this tax code is perfect for you." But like John Kerry's recent proposal for a small corporate tax rate cut, this may indicate a Democratic awakening to the serious challenges facing the federal tax system. The GOP challenge will be to start working with forward-thinking Democrats and craft reform legislation in the next Congress.
Rising Tax Complexity under the GOP Number of pages in the tax code, regulations, and IRS rulings 1995 40,500 2004 60,044 Number of different IRS tax forms 2000 475 2004 529 Number of tax loopholes for education and training 1994 16 2004 28 Percent of taxpayers using paid tax preparers 1995 50% 2003 62% H&R Block U.S. tax preparation revenues 1996 $0.7 billion 2003 $1.9 billion Pages in Form 1040 instruction book 1995 84 2003 131 Average time to complete Form 1040 and Schs. A, B, D 1995 21.2 hours 2003 28.5 hours
Sources: Author's calculations, CCH Inc., IRS, National Taxpayers Union, and H&R Block.
This article was published in The Washington Times, July 14, 2004.
Tax reform bump
The GOP should support the FairTax. President Bush should take up the issue as a second term agenda item.
FMCDH(BITS)
If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.
John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:
H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.Refer for additional information: http://www.fairtax.org & http://www.salestax.org
Politicians are quite fond of using the tax code as a re-election issue, and then, once re-elected, they promptly forget what they said and continue business as usual.
The only way the tax code will ever change is when the American people vote the oily bastards out of office and elect honest men and women to replace them!
Attaboy, Taxman! Glad to see you're in fightin' spirits!
We must continue to spread the word about the Fair Tax and the manifold benefits the Fair Tax will bring to the American people and the US economy -- one mind at a time, we can and must prevail!
“I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” [Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush, 1800.]
Click here and here to help us scrap the Code, scrap the IRS and abolish the VLWC!
You can also click here to sign a petition in support of Fundamental Tax Replacement.
We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS!
When I saw Steny Hoyer and the Dems on the House floor after hours talking up tax reform, I figured they must be feeling the heat of the Fair Tax in the views of their constituents. So they're coming up with their approach to make people think tax reform is high on their agenda. My guess is the Dems will wind up proposing temporary cuts in payroll taxes and increases in income taxes. What are your thoughts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.