Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Opinions certainly seem to vary on this topic.
1 posted on 07/30/2004 11:12:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Science list Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
2 posted on 07/30/2004 11:14:02 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Since 28 Oct 1999, #26,303, over 192 threads posted, and somehow never suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"rarer"?


3 posted on 07/30/2004 11:15:52 AM PDT by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

All I know is that if space is infinite then there has to be at least one.


4 posted on 07/30/2004 11:17:07 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

There was a book written on this very topic a few years back, but the name escapes me at the moment.


5 posted on 07/30/2004 11:17:12 AM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"Even then, the wobble is detectable only for giant planets, which are those about as big as Jupiter.."

So what does this tell them about the existance of earth-sized planets? Zippo.

In all the millions of galaxies, each with millions of stars, its hard to believe that whatever conditions were conducive to the formation of life here did not also occur elsewhere.


6 posted on 07/30/2004 11:17:37 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Creationist arguments aside, its hard to say really if another Earth could develop somewhere.


8 posted on 07/30/2004 11:18:29 AM PDT by RockinRight (Liberalism IS the status quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I wonder if Martin beer is any relation to the great german astronomer Wilhelm Beer.


9 posted on 07/30/2004 11:18:49 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist (<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
110 out of BILLIONs of stars in one galaxy alone and they are already throwing in the towel? Sheesh... we just got started!

Do these knotheads never stop to think that there may be as many different processes for planet formation as there are dust clouds coalescing into stellar nebula? That each may be radically different from the next depending on the ratio and composition of elements contained therein?

That just because one person uses Nestle and I use Hersey's that the end result couldn't still be one darn tasty chocolate chip cookie?

Don't they teach logic any more?

10 posted on 07/30/2004 11:20:13 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Big News, the longer we study the Universe the more it invariably points to a Creator who designed this little "happenstance" called Earth.


12 posted on 07/30/2004 11:23:56 AM PDT by RUCKUS INC. ("Wow, what a crapweasel." - Frank_Discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
There are 110 of these extrasolar planets, at the latest count, and they are all between about a tenth and ten times as massive as Jupiter. Most of them are, however, much closer to their sun than Jupiter is to ours

Why is this surprising? If we're using gravitational anomolies to detect planets, of course it's going to be easier to find large planets that are close to their sun, because the effects of gravity are much greater.

25 posted on 07/30/2004 11:53:06 AM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; AAABEST; Mycroft Holmes

Drake equation ping. I always go back and forth on this ....


26 posted on 07/30/2004 11:56:30 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

When there are billions of stars in each galaxy, and billions of galaxies, it's kinda hard to believe we're unique.


28 posted on 07/30/2004 12:00:27 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Are We Alone (reason to ponder what makes the earth unique)


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1181928/posts


30 posted on 07/30/2004 12:02:26 PM PDT by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
They suggest that other planets were not formed by the same kind of process that produced our Solar System, so they might not have smaller, habitable companions.

We've been over all this time and again on FR. Current detection methods select a highly specific (and probably highly unusual) sample which tells us little about Earth-like (or even Jupiter-like) worlds.

The idea that these close binary brown dwarf systems formed differently from our solar system in no way supports the title of this article, even if the idea is perfectly correct.

31 posted on 07/30/2004 12:02:41 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I know as much about this as any non-specialist. Rare Earth makes as good an argument as the SETI proponents. One significant difference: the negative case is falsifiable (just find some ETs or an Earthlike extra-solar planet). The positive case can be continued literally forever: "They are there, we just haven't found them yet." It is worth some effort to find out, but anyone who claims to have the answer now is frankly full of crap.
36 posted on 07/30/2004 12:07:16 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (A few words for the media: Julius Streicher, follow his path, share his fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
They also tend to have more elongated orbits than those of Jupiter and the Earth, both of which orbit the Sun on almost circular paths.

I thought our planets' orbits were "wildly elliptical."

39 posted on 07/30/2004 12:10:38 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Planets ten times as massive as Jupiter, those are some big-ass planets.


41 posted on 07/30/2004 12:11:20 PM PDT by jpl ("Go balloons, go ballons! Confetti, confetti, where's the confetti?" - Don Mischer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

HMMPH! Bodes well for the rest of the galaxy, then...


43 posted on 07/30/2004 12:12:15 PM PDT by Dawgmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Wow, 6 posts before the hijacking attempts.


53 posted on 07/30/2004 12:35:14 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Tourette's syndrome is just a $&#$*!% excuse for poor *%$#** language skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Is the Cosmos a Work of Poor Engineering or the Gift of an Artistic Designer?

The God's Must be Tidy!

54 posted on 07/30/2004 12:35:27 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson